Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
  • Id: 88713
  • Posted: 2019-12-18 02:41:22
    by asuraichermit
  • Size: 1280x1135
  • Rating: Safe
  • Score: 37 (vote up)
Options
History
Related Posts
artist_request asuraichermit_(manipper) bbw caption caption_only fart fat femsub hypnotic_gas inflation manip ssbbw text weight_gain

Edit | Respond

4 comments (0 hidden)

RedCollarBlackCollar
>> #348304
Posted on 2019-12-18 03:08:34
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Please remember to tag the artist and include a source link.
GrandDad
>> #348361
Posted on 2019-12-18 18:36:15
Score: 1 (vote Up)
i think moto moto likes you
NamesAreForTheWeak
>> #348609
Posted on 2019-12-20 14:46:51
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Is there a way we can distinguish between somewhat-healthy levels of fat and "holy crap how is this person capable of moving" fat as far as tagging goes?

Because I'm all for a non-supermodel figure, but I reckon it being this excessive is a turn-off for a lot of people.
Hawkeye
>> #348612
Posted on 2019-12-20 15:11:03
Score: 0 (vote Up)
NamesAreForTheWeak said:
Is there a way we can distinguish between somewhat-healthy levels of fat and "holy crap how is this person capable of moving" fat as far as tagging goes?

Because I'm all for a non-supermodel figure, but I reckon it being this excessive is a turn-off for a lot of people.


Maybe like with "long_hair" and "very_long_hair" and with "large_breasts" and "huge_breasts", we should have "chubby", "fat", and "morbidly_obese" for different levels of weight?
1