Search
(Supports wildcard *)Character
- ? face hugger 27
General
- ? cell phone 2098
- ? femsub 131813
- ? parody 266
- ? red lipstick 1536
- ? robot 2312
- ? short hair 40958
- ? solo 20776
- ? tech control 23022
Statistics
- Id: 94618
-
Posted: 2020-04-27 20:17:38
by OrangeJuicestice - Size: 1024x512
- Source: www.dailydot.com/irl/patr...porn-ban-sexual-violence/
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 64 (vote up)
>> #366493
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #366495
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #366497
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I remember this being from an article talking about online hypnosis fetish communities. That being said, please make sure to properly link the source + tag the post.
They always talk about the roleplay/erotic hypnosis communities and never the art ones. I guess we just aren't PR-friendly enough...
>> #366498
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #366499
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I remember this being from an article talking about online hypnosis fetish communities. That being said, please make sure to properly link the source + tag the post.
Can you link to that article? I´m intrigued to read outside perspectives on this little community.
>> #366501
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #366505
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Can you link to that article? I´m intrigued to read outside perspectives on this little community.
archive.fo/wYkZ1
>> #366507
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #366515
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #366517
Score: 0 (vote Up)
archive.fo/wYkZ1
Interesting. On one hand, I can see why they consider hypnosis 'coerced consent'. A lot of hypnosis stuff walks the fine line of rape (with some going over the line). On the other hand, deciding what kind of stuff is fine isn't black and white. One person's 'fine art' is another 'horrific porn'