Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? touhou 2363
Character
- ? marisa kirisame 129
- ? reimu hakurei 290
Artist
- ? asanagi 17
General
- ? blonde hair 33084
- ? brown eyes 6580
- ? brown hair 29411
- ? collar 13658
- ? empty eyes 36297
- ? fangs 1720
- ? femsub 132276
- ? happy trance 46692
- ? hat 7106
- ? holding hands 419
- ? leash 1917
- ? long hair 58081
- ? open mouth 47019
- ? sub on sub 1014
- ? tongue 19098
- ? tongue out 18337
- ? yellow eyes 4782
- ? yuri 6335
>> #1320
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #1329
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Absolutely adore his art style, though.
>> #1331
Score: 0 (vote Up)
misogynistic
Oh, come on, leave that word to the social media feminists. If you're talking about <<exhentai.org/g/520277/98dd22e566/|this doujin>>, hell, I loved it, even KinkyLoli did (I actually found one translated for her).
I just wish more of his stories would involve outright Mind Control. I like Mind Break sometimes, too, but...it's not the same.
I know the feeling. The fact that mind break content outnumbers mind control by about 4:1 makes me more often than not enjoy it just because there's some that are so well done.
>> #1334
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Oh, come on, leave that word to the social media feminists.
Just because it's overly used by a group of people that are often times supportive of women to the point of misandry doesn't make it any less a word, or its definition any less a valid concept. The word exists. The concept exists. Some people really are misogynists to this day, unfortunately.
I know the feeling. The fact that mind break content outnumbers mind control by about 4:1 makes me more often than not enjoy it just because there's some that are so well done.
Very much agreed.
>> #1341
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Just because it's overly used by a group of people that are often times supportive of women to the point of misandry doesn't make it any less a word, or its definition any less a valid concept. The word exists. The concept exists. Some people really are misogynists to this day, unfortunately.
On the realm of reality, I do agree that misogyny is a problem, particularly in places like India, China, middle east, etc (NOT in the civilized world where most feminists rant from, where sometimes actually misandry is the problem).
On the realm of fantasy, heck, if there was a "misandry" tag, I'd browse it, because the sheer idiocy of feminists made me actually get off on it most of the time. I hate those scumbags with a passion, and anything that pisses them off makes me happy, for some bizarre reason.
I do realize it's fucked up, but to my defense, I was pro-feminism before I knew what modern feminism was (for whoever who's confused, <<fav.me/d47x2of|this>> and many other things is what I'm talking about).
>> #1342
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Let's all just agree that inequality of any kind is bad.
>> #1359
Score: 0 (vote Up)
[the rant]
You and I feel similarly, then.
I was pro-feminism before I knew what modern feminism was
Same. I'm more a gender equalist, nowadays. Of course, my wish for equality ends at rights and handling of laws between genders and races. Anything beyond that, and equalism becomes potentially ugly and, ironically, unfair.
Let's all just agree that inequality of any kind is bad.
Careful, Mindwipe. That statement can totally open Pandora's Box. If you think what we said could start a fire, you'll be surprised that this could start an inferno. Don't burn me bro. Being equal in all things is totally not as cool as it seems at first thought.
>> #1361
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #1362
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Don't take too much of what I say 100% literally.
*snickers* Every time I read the word "literally" from you, I think of...
If it means nothing literally, then is it figurative by definition?
>> #1369
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Honestly, I don't see how a deviantART journal listing a few quotes from random "feminists" makes any sort of point about the movement.
Let's all just agree that inequality of any kind is bad.
First of all, they're not random "feminists". They're The Feminists that have defined how the movement works, for example one of these was who wrote some <<en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto|cornerstone book>> of what defines the current behaviors of the likes of <<www.youtube.com/watch?v=25o0EZiogw0|Anita Sarkeesian>>. In other words, no, that's not quoting out of context, that is their core values.
And secondly, I don't believe we're all made equal. Some people contribute more, risk more, innovate more, and deserve more. To enforce artificial equality is to ignore the fact that some people have earned their place. This is not to say that some people didn't - I just think we should perfect the mechanism of giving more to the ones who give most to society, instead of trying to imply equal rights means equal benefits.
You and I feel similarly, then.
It really looks like our views match well with each other! For which I'm glad.
Don't take too much of what I say 100% literally.
But you look so much more serious on the outside when you talk like that! lol.