Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? my little pony 3284
Character
- ? applejack 303
- ? derpy hooves 39
- ? fluttershy 436
- ? pinkie pie 321
- ? rainbow dash 385
- ? rarity 426
- ? twilight sparkle 776
Artist
- ? mcaesar (manipper) 25
- ? trishbot 212
General
- ? barefoot 11976
- ? blonde hair 32999
- ? bottomless 40786
- ? breasts 103243
- ? cowgirl 180
- ? discolored nipples 874
- ? expressionless 20331
- ? feet 8970
- ? femsub 131797
- ? freckles 1961
- ? hat 7084
- ? horns 7114
- ? hypnotic eyes 10019
- ? kaa eyes 12696
- ? large breasts 58274
- ? long hair 57929
- ? maledom 35314
- ? multicolored hair 6306
- ? nipples 16044
- ? nude 38464
- ? open mouth 46913
- ? personification 564
- ? pink hair 10409
- ? standing 12411
- ? standing at attention 5688
- ? straight-cut bangs 1176
- ? topless 44485
- ? wings 3595
Meta
- ? caption 8906
- ? manip 16632
- ? text 82231
- ? western 9304
Statistics
- Id: 9858
-
Posted: 2013-09-30 00:28:53
by Reccy - Size: 2016x1200
- Source: trishbot.deviantart.com/a...Playthings-NSFW-259371349
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 45 (vote up)
This post belongs to a
parent post.
Child posts are often subsequent pages of a doujinshi, or minor variations of the parent post.
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #2006
Score: 0 (vote Up)
sleepymaid.com/chan/furry/res/1047.html#1097
How was my tagging?
>> #2008
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #2010
Score: 0 (vote Up)
How was my tagging?
Good enough that I copied them onto the other 2 versions of this pic (you left off the artist, btw). I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
>> #2013
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #2017
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Good enough that I copied them onto the other 2 versions of this pic (you left off the artist, btw). I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
Alright, thank you MindWipe!
>> #192928
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
Apparently someone put the furry tag back. That said, I think there IS enough to call this furry, so take that as you will.
>> #192930
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Apparently someone put the furry tag back. That said, I think there IS enough to call this furry, so take that as you will.
Disagreed. The skin color is clearly just skin color, a few of them have skin that's shining in a way fur definitely wouldn't. And I don't think tails and wings and colored skin qualify for furry.