And now for something a bit experimental. I've been playing around with the latest in high tech VR technology. Google cardboard ( www.google.com/get/cardboard/ ). Gotta say it works really well for a cardboard box with a phone in it. This is my attempt at making the Team PoMoon animation a piece of VR hypnoporn for it. An example of science going too far if I ever heard one
I'm told some people can make these appear 3d by crossing their eyes but I never got that to work. But loading the image up on your phone and putting it into the cardboard should work great
Here's the APNG version. Android phones don't support APNG by default so I've been using the program Omni Gif to play it. i.imgur.com/tiD2yfg.png
Not much you can do about it as a mannipper; but the two pictures have too strong an angle difference from each other. Makes the two images when viewed overlapping conflict with eachother rather than merge together to form a 3D image.
Changer said: Not much you can do about it as a mannipper; but the two pictures have too strong an angle difference from each other. Makes the two images when viewed overlapping conflict with eachother rather than merge together to form a 3D image.
Actually I'm the one who "angled" them. Are you using cross eyes or cardboard? It works great with the cardboard but maybe I can get away with more difference when using the hardware
I can get it to work somewhat cross-eyed as well, though the image is blurry for me that way. I guess my eyeglasses don't work too well when I'm not focusing normally. Probably would work great with cardboard though..
Have to agree with the others. This really is a hard to do Version of a cross eyed picture, but it works if you have some practice in it. Took me about 2 min to get it right. But it's still really hard to focus on even when you figured out how to look at it.
EdgeOfTheMoon said: Actually I'm the one who "angled" them. Are you using cross eyes or cardboard? It works great with the cardboard but maybe I can get away with more difference when using the hardware
I'm doing it cross eyed; but I have experience doing that method. The problem is, a lot of parts in the picture that are given sharply different degrees of change are right next to each other.
For instance, if you use the top girl's spiral eyes to lock the picture into place you have the hand right next to it which suddenly appears to be far more out of focus than it should be. The hand is similar size to the other hands visible, so it looks like it should not be more than a few inches closer than the rest of the picture, but it is as out of focus as it should be if it was several feet closer.
Almost no spot on the picture I can find can be connected without having something right next to it more out of focus than it should be, which results in a lot of blurring, and a lot of phantom overlaps. It makes it rather unpleasant to look at.
A picture like this, static.fjcdn.com/large/pictures/bf/b1/bfb1ae_411754.jpg on the other hand has the differences very subtle, so while some spots may become out of focus as you look at other spots, they feel like they are out of focus by just the right amount and isn't distracting. With this one, I can lock the image into focus with minimal effort without any need to locate an exact shared detail.
>> #50735
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm told some people can make these appear 3d by crossing their eyes but I never got that to work. But loading the image up on your phone and putting it into the cardboard should work great
Here's the APNG version. Android phones don't support APNG by default so I've been using the program Omni Gif to play it. i.imgur.com/tiD2yfg.png
>> #50738
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50740
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Not much you can do about it as a mannipper; but the two pictures have too strong an angle difference from each other. Makes the two images when viewed overlapping conflict with eachother rather than merge together to form a 3D image.
Actually I'm the one who "angled" them. Are you using cross eyes or cardboard? It works great with the cardboard but maybe I can get away with more difference when using the hardware
>> #50750
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50757
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50769
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50806
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Actually I'm the one who "angled" them. Are you using cross eyes or cardboard? It works great with the cardboard but maybe I can get away with more difference when using the hardware
I'm doing it cross eyed; but I have experience doing that method. The problem is, a lot of parts in the picture that are given sharply different degrees of change are right next to each other.
For instance, if you use the top girl's spiral eyes to lock the picture into place you have the hand right next to it which suddenly appears to be far more out of focus than it should be. The hand is similar size to the other hands visible, so it looks like it should not be more than a few inches closer than the rest of the picture, but it is as out of focus as it should be if it was several feet closer.
Almost no spot on the picture I can find can be connected without having something right next to it more out of focus than it should be, which results in a lot of blurring, and a lot of phantom overlaps. It makes it rather unpleasant to look at.
A picture like this, static.fjcdn.com/large/pictures/bf/b1/bfb1ae_411754.jpg on the other hand has the differences very subtle, so while some spots may become out of focus as you look at other spots, they feel like they are out of focus by just the right amount and isn't distracting. With this one, I can lock the image into focus with minimal effort without any need to locate an exact shared detail.
>> #50824
Score: 0 (vote Up)
*Lots of advice*
Better? imgur.com/jgHQ2Xh
This is just turning down the depth from a maximum of 45 px difference to 15 px difference
>> #50832
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50835
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>_>