I'm thinking about it but shouldn't Loli/Shota be blacklisted by default for unregistered users/noscripted users?

They are.

This.

Also, you mean the browser addon, NoScript, right? There's nothing we can do for those people. They just have to allow our site to run scripts.

So the hiding of loli/shots only happens client-side?

It still gets downloaded, it just doesn't get shown?

That seems like the wrong way for that to be coded, to me... Should open a ticket with the developer that the whole point of a blacklist is so the blacklisted material doesn't end up in your computer.

Nono. I wasn't strictly talking about the blacklist. Those are saved in their very own table in the database and are applied when you search. As far as I'm aware, no evidence of their existence will reach your computer.

But this software uses Javascript left and right. Not having it enabled makes using this site hopeless. I can see why the way I worded it would make it seem like I'm talking about the blacklist in particular, though.

Now, at the same time, I'm not sure how or where or even if Javascript is used in the blacklisting process, so there's a chance that using noscript to block javascript COULD break its functions.