the thing is, nipples are normally not that big; we tend to use "large" for anything obviously above average but still believable, and "huge" for anything big enough to lack credulity [we don't currently use hyper for goofily large or udder like]
in other words, rather then being a set increment of size, its about proportionality and believability, ie:

no mention: anything that sticks out, thus no need for small/tiny - is this a fetish I'm just completely oblivious to? I simply can't imagine anything so small, except for humorously needing magnification, that needs calling out
large: noticeably large, but not ridiculously so
huge: anything that seems ridiculously big, regardless of whether its physically possible, from a full inch to cucumbers and beyond

To what extent does "pet play" apply to certain posts?
Is it just whenever a human acts like an animal beyond something like a cat/dog/horse, perhaps like a chicken?

It seems wrong to me that the only tag that can cover someone flashing their goods is undressing or exhibitionism. Exhibitionism doesn't even apply to solos. Flashing is a specific, intended act, I would say mutually exclusive with undressing.

It might apply to just a couple hundred posts were it introduced.

Can u give a few example posts?

hypnohub.net/post/show/48928/
hypnohub.net/post/show/48946/
hypnohub.net/post/show/43481/
hypnohub.net/post/show/17566/

I didn't realize there was shirt_lift, but obviously that excludes the mechanics of pulling a shirt down. A lot of posts are spread out among that, undressing, topless, breasts_outside, and sometimes open_clothes or worse.

flash might not be the best term since it's a narrow exhibitionist concept, but something to represent pulling clothes away to reveal something without actually undressing seems needed.

But how can you know that the person in the pic isn't just taking their clothes off? We can't know intent in a static image.



In the past, it has applied to any pic of a subject acting like an animal. Any animal.

We tag based on mindset all the time on hypnohub.

48946 is very clearly not undressing. But for this case, it's not that intent needs to be determined; the issues are (1) undressing is a bad fit, and (2) the "reveal" concept is spread out among more than 4 tags, none of which are a good candidate for the universal.

Created a VN_Layout tag, for any posts that have that kinda set up/look. Obviously fairly niche tag, but I figure we have a buncha posts that would fall under it.

EDIT (5/28/17):
Created both a "popstar" tag, tho "idol" might be better suited for that, and a "tiny_body" tag, as far as posts that factor in a character's size to their environment and/or other characters involved. Posts just involving just tiny characters in general I would ultimately try to avoid tagging, as it just adds pics that don't relate to the main idea of it (that being a noticeable size difference).

I have some ideas, I'm fairly sure they'd be OK but I'm not entirely sure what they should be called.

1. Being made to enjoy hypnosis, like aware + happy_trance but where being happy with it was itself a result of hypnosis. The aware tag is rather small but I think there's some under-representation there.
2. Denial, (not to be confused with orgasm_denial) where the sub is actively denying that they're under any control, or insisting that their actions are of their own will. Could include "I'm only doing this because I want to" or such without mentioning hypnosis.

I feel like both are super niche and limited, though that's not to dismiss them completely. Denial particularly seems a bit harder to work around as far as tagging...

Created a 'hair covering one eye' and 'hair covering both eyes' tag, as I figure those are both pretty relevant.

Cowgirl vs cow_girl...
Could use some clarification on these, as one involves furries/TF, one involves cosplay // pet play, and one involves women in cowboy outfits.

Think maybe "cow" would work better for the pet play one like we have for "chicken", cow_girl would work for furries and such, and "cowboy outfit" can be its own tag.
Thoughts?

It could be more prevalent in erotica, or at least the stuff I read. I was thinking "clueless" for the second one, like unaware but more so. I can see why it's potentially too limiting. I just think that as a site about hypnosis, we should have more ways to categorize things relating to hypnosis.

I thought "cowgirl" refers to a female version of the far west cowboy type, or the sexual position (though that's instinctively only). Should we be tagging sexual positions? I don't know if I know that many ._.

What you've proposed seems reasonable, but might require a lot of fixing on something that may not need fixing other than for the sake of gender equality. I honestly think it's good as it is.

Question: Could we get a "Non-Death Vore" or "Positive Vore" tag?

vore -death