goddamit i posted the same thing twice accidentally

hypnohub.net/post/show/36...radily_-manipper-cum-cum_

i meant this

bump? i really want to know if this is allowed because i want to use it

I think that one seems ok.

Was post #81896 supposed to have been deleted? It wasn't replaced by a higher quality version as the deletion reason states.

Post #81896 is a manip of the original version of the image, its child post, post #81897, is a manip of a blacked edit done by abcdman123.

i think you should be asking the uploader since theyre most likely the one who deleted it

Based on the uploader's comment on post #81897 about updating the source on the parent post, it doesn't sound like they intended to delete it.

Edit: Now post #81896 has been restored and post #81897 has been deleted?

What I meant was that it looked like neither of them should have been deleted, as they appeared to be a parent/child pair with alternate skin colors.

Can a moderator please restore post #62400? It was deleted when <<hypnohub.net/post/show/83411|an upscaled version>> was posted, but wasn't restored when the upscaled version was deleted.

Done.

is panda part of hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=frequently_asked_questions still current?

Since its back up I assume the panda is still there.

{edit] the page has been reverted

The large_breasts tag is added to a lot of images that don't need it by the same user.

Examples:
hypnohub.net/post/show/83268
hypnohub.net/post/show/62922
hypnohub.net/post/show/14375

And he's still at it: hypnohub.net/history?search=type%3Apost+user%3AMaDrow

The tag is not always inappropriate where he adds it (ratio varies day to day, with a lot of edge cases) so I don't think there is malicious intent, but still.

Mods, assuming you agree with me could you maybe talk to the guy?

I removed most of them as the girls in more than half of them are pretty much flat or nowhere near large

That's appreciated, but those were just 3 examples out of... uh... the user has 8500 tag edits, ~80% of those add large_breasts, in at least one in four the tag clearly should not be there (plus a lot of edge cases). That's the problem I tried to point out.

It's up to you mods of course, but a friendly request to the guy to stop adding the tag so liberally would save everyone a lot of work.

Should post #50052 have been deleted?

It was apparently deleted when explicit loli and shota was purged, but it isn't actually explicit. Heck, <<danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2765991|on Danbooru>> they don't even think it's loli.

Post #73421 is no longer paysite content, as the artist <<twitter.com/Orange_PEELart/status/1115589719449047040|posted it on twitter>> back in april.