Regarding AI works
So AI-made artworks seems to be becoming a trend on Twitter. That goes for mind control content as well. Some of these works are very close to what a human can make. So I'm preemptively raising some concerns for any AI works uploaded in the future.
1. How would it be tagged, as in attribution? Should it be attributed to the person giving the prompt? Should it be attributed to the AI that made it? Should it just be tagged "AI_art"? Is any of this even necessary?
2. AI art can be generated much faster than a human can draw. There could be a situation where the hub is flooded with AI artworks. Granted this applies also to mass-produced human-drawn works so this might not be an issue.
3. It would be quite hard to determine which art is human-drawn and which are AI-drawn. If someone does not specify a work is AI-drawn (whether accidentally or intentionally), I would think there's no way to know.
On an unrelated note I think this is bad for those who rely on commissions as income. Although I like seeing AI art just like human-drawn ones, I can't help but feel a bit sorry for those artist whose living depended on commissions.
Edit:
The mod decisions are as follows:
1. How would it be tagged, as in attribution? Should it be attributed to the person giving the prompt? Should it be attributed to the AI that made it? Should it just be tagged "AI_art"? Is any of this even necessary?
2. AI art can be generated much faster than a human can draw. There could be a situation where the hub is flooded with AI artworks. Granted this applies also to mass-produced human-drawn works so this might not be an issue.
3. It would be quite hard to determine which art is human-drawn and which are AI-drawn. If someone does not specify a work is AI-drawn (whether accidentally or intentionally), I would think there's no way to know.
On an unrelated note I think this is bad for those who rely on commissions as income. Although I like seeing AI art just like human-drawn ones, I can't help but feel a bit sorry for those artist whose living depended on commissions.
Edit:
The mod decisions are as follows:
Detour said:
After a brief chat with other mods/admins on the topic here's how we're expecting to handle AI art for the time being:
- Any post that involves AI (either generated or edited) gets the ai_art meta tag
- Artists can give themselves an artist tag as normal
- Optionally the AI method (e.g. novelai or stable diffusion) gets it's own separate artist tag
We're not planning to outright ban any type of AI work as long as it stays within reasonable bounds (no spam or flood of low-quality submissions)
After a brief chat with other mods/admins on the topic here's how we're expecting to handle AI art for the time being:
- Any post that involves AI (either generated or edited) gets the ai_art meta tag
- Artists can give themselves an artist tag as normal
- Optionally the AI method (e.g. novelai or stable diffusion) gets it's own separate artist tag
We're not planning to outright ban any type of AI work as long as it stays within reasonable bounds (no spam or flood of low-quality submissions)
Detour said:
Generator is probably what we'll end up going with unless someone suggests a better alternative, it's far enough removed from the _(ai) suffix we're using for the actual models themselves (e.g. stable diffusion and novelai) while still relatively clear in meaning.
EDIT: Also considering _(ai_model) for the models, let me know what sounds/feels better.
Generator is probably what we'll end up going with unless someone suggests a better alternative, it's far enough removed from the _(ai) suffix we're using for the actual models themselves (e.g. stable diffusion and novelai) while still relatively clear in meaning.
EDIT: Also considering _(ai_model) for the models, let me know what sounds/feels better.