Celebrity fan-art?
I dunno if I'm in the minority, but I feel that fan art of celebrities being hypnotized is severely lacking on this website. Please tell me I'm not the only one?
I'm fairly certain real life photo manips are banned here.
JksAccount said:
I'm fairly certain real life photo manips are banned here.
I'm fairly certain real life photo manips are banned here.
Not talking about manips, but just drawings of celebrities.
LearOnAWind said:
Not talking about manips, but just drawings of celebrities.
Not talking about manips, but just drawings of celebrities.
Well...in this site, i see AJ Lee and Natalya from WWE hypnotized.
DouDile said:
Well...in this site, i see AJ Lee and Natalya from WWE hypnotized.
Well...in this site, i see AJ Lee and Natalya from WWE hypnotized.
Aren't wrestlers technically fictional characters anyway? XD
LearOnAWind said:
Aren't wrestlers technically fictional characters anyway? XD
Aren't wrestlers technically fictional characters anyway? XD
not really.
I find it kinda off-putting to have any non-fictional characters be featured on the site (except Erika ofc, and the stuff that like Lex posts). Part of it has to do with the stigma against our fetish, and the other part's my general disdain for depicting real people that might not want to have anything to do with the fetish... [shrug]
RedCollarBlackCollar said:
I find it kinda off-putting to have any non-fictional characters be featured on the site (except Erika ofc, and the stuff that like Lex posts). Part of it has to do with the stigma against our fetish, and the other part's my general disdain for depicting real people that might not want to have anything to do with the fetish... [shrug]
I find it kinda off-putting to have any non-fictional characters be featured on the site (except Erika ofc, and the stuff that like Lex posts). Part of it has to do with the stigma against our fetish, and the other part's my general disdain for depicting real people that might not want to have anything to do with the fetish... [shrug]
Same for me it's kind of off putting to see real pepole portrayed in porn like that. Though OCs are differnt since they choose to put the art out
Drawing pictures of celebrities (or any other normal human being) is against the copyright due to them having their own rights about themselves being portrayed anywhere. You'd literally have to get their permission or else you could get DMCA'd.
G3m4sSt4ff said:
Drawing pictures of celebrities (or any other normal human being) is against the copyright due to them having their own rights about themselves being portrayed anywhere. You'd literally have to get their permission or else you could get DMCA'd.
Drawing pictures of celebrities (or any other normal human being) is against the copyright due to them having their own rights about themselves being portrayed anywhere. You'd literally have to get their permission or else you could get DMCA'd.
this pretty much, also it just makes me think of those shitty deviantart manips
There is a lot of drawn celeb porn out there, ive not encountered any mind control/hypnosis stuff related to it though. I guess you could manip it
