HypnoHub - Is *all* real-life content forbidden?

UselessFish

09/05/17 04:46AM

Is all real-life content forbidden?

Specifically, in re: hypnohub.net/post/show/53833 and hypnohub.net/post/show/53834, these images aren't *manips* - at least, I don't think, unless you count "making a series of stills or a video into an animated gif" manipping, which...I wouldn't? Manipping is generally more obvious than that. Adding Kaa randomly, for instance.

The relevant portion of policy as far as I can tell:
>>Real Photo Manips
>>Manips of real photos and images are not permitted.

The deletion reasons:
>Real life manip
>No real life user content allowed

I am specifically somewhat surprised by "No real life user content allowed" as it seem like all of the entrancement-uk stuff would fall under that restriction, which it obviously *doesn't*, or else it wouldn't be up here, would it? Could the policy be officially clarified, anyway?

IDPet

09/05/17 04:49AM

Short Answer
>"MANIPS" of real photos are forbbiden
>Actual hypnosis (acting or real) are fine

KimeraUltimate

09/05/17 04:50AM

UselessFish said:
Specifically, in re: hypnohub.net/post/show/53833 and hypnohub.net/post/show/53834, these images aren't *manips* - at least, I don't think, unless you count "making a series of stills or a video into an animated gif" manipping, which...I wouldn't? Manipping is generally more obvious than that. Adding Kaa randomly, for instance.

The relevant portion of policy as far as I can tell:
>>Real Photo Manips
>>Manips of real photos and images are not permitted.

The deletion reasons:
>Real life manip
>No real life user content allowed

I am specifically somewhat surprised by "No real life user content allowed" as it seem like all of the entrancement-uk stuff would fall under that restriction, which it obviously *doesn't*, or else it wouldn't be up here, would it? Could the policy be officially clarified, anyway?

Funny how i just ranted a bit on the comment of the second post (the pendulum one), so the "No real life user content allowed" reason deserves explanation.

I can sort of get the spiral one however (still liked that one though >.>), it could've been manipped, or it was just good photography, I think he would have to state whether it was a manip or not

SlackerSavior

09/05/17 04:57AM

"For real-life images, there must be an obvious sign of hypnosis or mind control. All real-life photos and images must come from a media source that pertains to hypnosis or mind control. A source link must be included in the source field of the post."

Right above the rules on Guro in posting guidelines. It's gotta be something from something. For a lot of reasons, most having to do with protecting users from being on a porn site, and the site itself if a user who put themselves up on the site went sour on that arrangement.

OrangeJuicestice

09/05/17 05:00AM

So can someone post a link to the original gif?

IDPet

09/05/17 05:12AM

Yeah, without that rule just imagine this scenario:
>Take a family photo
>Share it via facebook
>A random user saves that photo and makes a hypno erotic scenario manip

UselessFish

09/05/17 05:22AM

KimeraUltimate said:
Funny how i just ranted a bit on the comment of the second post (the pendulum one), so the "No real life user content allowed" reason deserves explanation.

I can sort of get the spiral one however (still liked that one though >.>), it could've been manipped, or it was just good photography, I think he would have to state whether it was a manip or not

It was just photography.

IDPet said:
Yeah, without that rule just imagine this scenario:
>Take a family photo
>Share it via facebook
>A random user saves that photo and makes a hypno erotic scenario manip

...wut?

I'm not disputing the existence of the rule

I'm more disputing that the "no real life manips" rule *applies* (because it doesn't). Anywho. After a discussion with SlackerSavior on the Discord, yeah, I did miss the rule about no unsourced RL user content

IDPet

09/05/17 05:31AM

UselessFish said:
I'm not disputing the existence of the rule

I was just adding an example to Slackersavior's comment.

"For a lot of reasons, most having to do with protecting users from being on a porn site"

Sleepyhead97

09/05/17 10:30AM

UselessFish said:
Specifically, in re: hypnohub.net/post/show/53833 and hypnohub.net/post/show/53834, these images aren't *manips* - at least, I don't think, unless you count "making a series of stills or a video into an animated gif" manipping, which...I wouldn't? Manipping is generally more obvious than that. Adding Kaa randomly, for instance.

The relevant portion of policy as far as I can tell:
>>Real Photo Manips
>>Manips of real photos and images are not permitted.

The deletion reasons:
>Real life manip
>No real life user content allowed

I am specifically somewhat surprised by "No real life user content allowed" as it seem like all of the entrancement-uk stuff would fall under that restriction, which it obviously *doesn't*, or else it wouldn't be up here, would it? Could the policy be officially clarified, anyway?

Can you link the video you made the gifs from?

jimmaj1234

09/05/17 11:24AM

Sleepyhead97 said:
Can you link the video you made the gifs from?

Honestly we can't be left hanging now.

BlackWidow69x

09/05/17 12:03PM

Just in case the OP of the images doesn't come to the forum --

They shared the link as: forma-alliciens.tumblr.com/post/164989978770

So, definitely not a "non-consented RL manip" or anything like that.

random

09/06/17 06:02AM

IDPet said:
Yeah, without that rule just imagine this scenario:
>Take a family photo
>Share it via facebook
>A random user saves that photo and makes a hypno erotic scenario manip

This. I've had this happen to my photos and my friends in them. Having to break it to someone that their photos are potential fetish bait or creep magnets and they should be careful posting them isn't fun.

Ogodei-Khan

09/06/17 06:10AM

It's to keep the 3D trash out :-P