HypnoHub - One of thesethings is not like the other ........ ( you know the song)

One of thesethings is not like the other ........ ( you know the song)

Ive noticed theres been alot of irl hypno stuff being uploaded lately im not trying to judge but i thought that was against the rules anyway just figured if point it out as i thought it was wierd

foffyoul5 said:
Ive noticed theres been alot of irl hypno stuff being uploaded lately im not trying to judge but i thought that was against the rules anyway just figured if point it out as i thought it was wierd

Manips of IRL images/gifs that are not from a source that does IRL Hypnosis are not allowed.

Images/gifs from a source that does IRL hypnosis are allowed, as long as the only "manipulation" of the image/gif is post-processing to remove artefacting and improve the coloration and lighting within the image/gif (the normal stuff for even regular photos that a normal person would have gotten from a professional photographer they'd hired for an event such as a wedding.)

Example of an allowed IRL source is "Entrancement UK". The stuff that has that tag is stuff from a website (which will pretty much always be in the source link field within the first couple minutes after an upload of content from them) that actually hypnotizes women, films the act of hypnotizing them, and then makes money off of selling that footage. The stuff we get from Entrancement UK are the free teaser images/gifs that the person that runs that company makes for advertisement purposes and posts on here themselves.

godzillahomer

03/21/19 05:23PM

foffyoul5 said:
Ive noticed theres been alot of irl hypno stuff being uploaded lately im not trying to judge but i thought that was against the rules anyway just figured if point it out as i thought it was wierd

as far as I know the rules, they're allowed as long as they actually depict hypnosis; they tend to need a source to prove that, unless an exception is granted by a mod/admin

real life manips on the other hand are not allowed at all

could be wrong on any of these points, so someone with better rule knowledge, correct me and/or elaborate more, please

Anon_3.141

03/21/19 05:25PM

godzillahomer said:
as far as I know the rules, they're allowed as long as they actually depict hypnosis; they tend to need a source to prove that, unless an exception is granted by a mod/admin

real life manips on the other hand are not allowed at all

could be wrong on any of these points, so someone with better rule knowledge, correct me and/or elaborate more, please

The rule specifically is "Real Life Manips", yes. (With the exception that I previously mentioned involving general post-processing image/gif cleanup.)

godzillahomer

03/21/19 05:26PM

Anon_3.141 said:
Manips of IRL images/gifs that are not from a source that does IRL Hypnosis are not allowed.

Images/gifs from a source that does IRL hypnosis are allowed, as long as the only "manipulation" of the image/gif is post-processing to remove artefacting and improve the coloration and lighting within the image/gif (the normal stuff for even regular photos that a normal person would have gotten from a professional photographer they'd hired for an event such as a wedding.)

Example of an allowed IRL source is "Entrancement UK". The stuff that has that tag is stuff from a website (which will pretty much always be in the source link field within the first couple minutes after an upload of content from them) that actually hypnotizes women, films the act of hypnotizing them, and then makes money off of selling that footage. The stuff we get from Entrancement UK are the free teaser images/gifs that the person that runs that company makes for advertisement purposes and posts on here themselves.

heck, even if it's not real hypnosis and its acting, the pictures would still likely be allowed, its still supposed to be hypnosis

Anon_3.141

03/21/19 05:30PM

godzillahomer said:
heck, even if it's not real hypnosis and its acting, the pictures would still likely be allowed, its still supposed to be hypnosis

As long as the source itself is "non-manip" hypnosis (either real or fake (a.k.a.: acting) hypnosis, doesn't matter which), and the version posted here is itself not manipped, then it's fine. It's just that if it is the acting kind, it has to be stage style hypnosis, where the only facial indications of hypnosis is a "blank" expression, maybe a bit of drool, but stuff like putting spirals in the eyes is a no-no.

Jabberwocky

03/21/19 07:47PM

Anon_3.141 said:
As long as the source itself is "non-manip" hypnosis (either real or fake (a.k.a.: acting) hypnosis, doesn't matter which), and the version posted here is itself not manipped, then it's fine. It's just that if it is the acting kind, it has to be stage style hypnosis, where the only facial indications of hypnosis is a "blank" expression, maybe a bit of drool, but stuff like putting spirals in the eyes is a no-no.

That last part isn't true.

godzillahomer

03/21/19 07:55PM

Jabberwocky said:
That last part isn't true.

yep, plenty of ways to do it with acting, just swinging a pendant or pocket watch helps set the tone

Jabberwocky

03/21/19 08:00PM

godzillahomer said:
yep, plenty of ways to do it with acting, just swinging a pendant or pocket watch helps set the tone

No, I mean the part about spiral eyes. Effects like that are fine as long as they exist within the source of the image.

Hypnosis-guy

03/21/19 08:09PM

foffyoul5 said:
Ive noticed theres been alot of irl hypno stuff being uploaded lately im not trying to judge but i thought that was against the rules anyway just figured if point it out as i thought it was wierd

The Rules say:
Real Life Images
For real-life images, there must be an obvious sign of hypnosis or mind control. All real-life photos and images must come from a media source that pertains to hypnosis or mind control. A source link must be included in the source field of the post.

Jabberwocky said:
No, I mean the part about spiral eyes. Effects like that are fine as long as they exist within the source of the image.

The Rules say:
Real Photo Manips
Manips of real photos and images are not permitted.

Hope this helps both of you.

crazyman

03/21/19 08:14PM

Jabberwocky said:
No, I mean the part about spiral eyes. Effects like that are fine as long as they exist within the source of the image.

i personally dont think that should be allowed, because then any image can be uploaded and said "oh the effects are in the source"

Jabberwocky

03/21/19 08:29PM

Hypnosis-guy said:
Hope this helps both of you.

Special effects are not "manips."

crazyman said:
i personally dont think that should be allowed, because then any image can be uploaded and said "oh the effects are in the source"

Nope. It would have to be indicative of MC in the source, just like everything else that gets uploaded here.

crazyman

03/21/19 08:40PM

Jabberwocky said:
Nope. It would have to be indicative of MC in the source, just like everything else that gets uploaded here.

im just saying that that rule could be stretched farther than we would likely want

Hypnosis-guy

03/21/19 08:40PM

Jabberwocky said:
Special effects are not "manips."

Actually, if I remember correctly, a few years back there was a debate on use of a similar special effect and whether it should be allowed on the hub, it was ultimately decided to count as a manip and was removed. Maybe they'll change their minds about using special effects, but not likely.

Jabberwocky

03/21/19 08:45PM

Hypnosis-guy said:
Actually, if I remember correctly, a few years back there was a debate on use of a similar special effect and whether it should be allowed on the hub, it was ultimately decided to count as a manip and was removed. Maybe they'll change their minds about using special effects, but not likely.

Given that a number of real gifs with special effects have been kept up, I would assume that's not the case. It's a ridiculous position though, IMO. If spiral eyes in, say, a comic book to indicate MC if fine, then why should spiral eyes in a movie to indicate the same thing be any different? It isn't the same as manipping an existing clip to have spiral eyes, if the effect exists within the work itself then it's ridiculous to remove it based on a stupidly broad definition of "manip."