HypnoHub - Regarding explicit Lolicon/Shotacon content

grashok

05/27/19 11:26PM

Regarding explicit Lolicon/Shotacon content

I'll get straight to the point. a few weeks ago, I saw that a post was deleted. The reason being that Lolicon/Shotacon Content that is explicit is not allowed. Now this wasn't always the case but I don't see any problem with that rulechange. (btw. the rules state as follows: " Explicit depictions of lolicon and shotacon are not allowed regardless of realism. ") The problem is, that there are atleast 35 pages of such content on this site. Now my question is: is this just so, because removing such an high number of posts would take a while or is there another reason?

EoD

05/27/19 11:56PM

grashok said:
I'll get straight to the point. a few weeks ago, I saw that a post was deleted. The reason being that Lolicon/Shotacon Content that is explicit is not allowed. Now this wasn't always the case but I don't see any problem with that rulechange. (btw. the rules state as follows: " Explicit depictions of lolicon and shotacon are not allowed regardless of realism. ") The problem is, that there are atleast 35 pages of such content on this site. Now my question is: is this just so, because removing such an high number of posts would take a while or is there another reason?

I noticed that awhile back too. The rule change went into effect awhile back, end of last year I want to say, however if you go far enough back in the site's archive you find a lot of stuff that has been missed, and it isn't necessarily due to when it was uploaded because you'll find one or two missing images from a sequence that should all be gone.

IDPet

05/28/19 12:02AM

The rule apply to underage characters. For example a 9-years like girl, but doesn't apply to another ones. For example, girls that looks like 15 years old is allowed.

Also, you can post underage character if they aren't in a sexual situation.

For example, this is tagged as loli, but they aren't underage characters:
hypnohub.net/post/show/76...tomless-breasts-dialogue-

Argonis

05/28/19 12:11AM

That event came right under everyone's nose and we tried our best to comb over those posts and see which was was allowed or not.
Yes there are still loly/shota posts on here but we take into account, height, breasts if loli, and general visibility as well as other things to see if it would be ok or not.
what IDPet posted is a good example on that, so far each post has been looked at to see what was ok or not and if anyone feels that a posts should not be allowed they can contact one of us and we can discuss it on if it should be allowed.

TLDR: yeah that caught us off guard.

grashok

05/28/19 12:21AM

Argonis said:
That event came right under everyone's nose and we tried our best to comb over those posts and see which was was allowed or not.
Yes there are still loly/shota posts on here but we take into account, height, breasts if loli, and general visibility as well as other things to see if it would be ok or not.
what IDPet posted is a good example on that, so far each post has been looked at to see what was ok or not and if anyone feels that a posts should not be allowed they can contact one of us and we can discuss it on if it should be allowed.

TLDR: yeah that caught us off guard.

Ok. Then I'd ask you to atleast consider to rewrite the rules in such a way that it is clear, that not every Loli/shotacon content is meant, or rather that it regards underaged characters specifically.