hyreader
09/21/22 08:13PM
Argonis said:
I wish you could remove favorite posts from the post itself. say you go to a post and it turns out you already faved it but a new post gets uploaded that is like a sequel to that post , well now you have to look through pages and pages of through your faves tab [which you can't use the search bar in now] to find and unfave it so you can fave it again in an organized way.

I added it to my split of the site unofficial userscript here: hypnohub.net/index.php?pa...105958&pid=75#1206031
It was in an older version of the script though, so it may take more work to adapt it, I don't know how much.

Weak point is that it doesn't display any message like the "already in favorite" one (neither to confirm removal, nor to say removal failed if already removed)

edit: Italic above no longer apply
Hypnorgasm
10/03/22 11:07AM
I'm realizing how helpful the old site's tag implications were and really starting to miss them. For instance, tags like "cum_in_mouth" would automatically also be tagged with "cum". Without tag implications, the general tagging quality has dropped significantly. If I want to search for (or avoid) anything with cum, I could try using asterisks (*cum*), but that's not a great solution, and it doesn't work with tags like "nude", which used to automatically add "topless" and "bottomless". If I want to search (or avoid) everything with breasts, I can no longer just use that tag; I have to know all the variants (small/large/huge/hyper_breasts).
Users who don't know about this (probably the vast majority) are going to be missing so many good posts, even when they're looking for them. It's sad.
TheGrandOleRuski
10/03/22 12:19PM
Hypnorgasm said:
I'm realizing how helpful the old site's tag implications were and really starting to miss them. For instance, tags like "cum_in_mouth" would automatically also be tagged with "cum". Without tag implications, the general tagging quality has dropped significantly. If I want to search for (or avoid) anything with cum, I could try using asterisks (*cum*), but that's not a great solution, and it doesn't work with tags like "nude", which used to automatically add "topless" and "bottomless". If I want to search (or avoid) everything with breasts, I can no longer just use that tag; I have to know all the variants (small/large/huge/hyper_breasts).
Users who don't know about this (probably the vast majority) are going to be missing so many good posts, even when they're looking for them. It's sad.


I miss the old site more and more every day.
loganblast39
10/03/22 05:21PM
Hypnorgasm said:
I'm realizing how helpful the old site's tag implications were and really starting to miss them. For instance, tags like "cum_in_mouth" would automatically also be tagged with "cum". Without tag implications, the general tagging quality has dropped significantly. If I want to search for (or avoid) anything with cum, I could try using asterisks (*cum*), but that's not a great solution, and it doesn't work with tags like "nude", which used to automatically add "topless" and "bottomless". If I want to search (or avoid) everything with breasts, I can no longer just use that tag; I have to know all the variants (small/large/huge/hyper_breasts).
Users who don't know about this (probably the vast majority) are going to be missing so many good posts, even when they're looking for them. It's sad.


yeah it was really helpful! frankly i'm getting a little sick of having to manually add shit like copyright tags to images which really shouldve had them added by default
<<<18192021 22


Reply | Forum Index