ribcaca
03/30/23 08:53PM
Ai generated hypnosis content
did anyone have any luck using stable diffusion to make hypno lewds?
jigiyak
03/30/23 09:54PM
yes, many people actually the naked dogeza series being one the most recent, but if we're talking about Hypno lewds that have the hypno in the picture itself, then i can't think of one actually
ribcaca
03/30/23 11:51PM
jigiyak said:
yes, many people actually the naked dogeza series being one the most recent, but if we're talking about Hypno lewds that have the hypno in the picture itself, then i can't think of one actually


i will try my stable diffuser to see what will come out
LordVrane
04/09/23 10:28PM
ribcaca said:
did anyone have any luck using stable diffusion to make hypno lewds?


Already did, there are a few LORAs that are specifically made for us estimated enjoyers of fine kinks like us. A pain to create semi-realistic content, unfortunately, but for comics styles like hentai they work like a charm.
Shazra
04/10/23 11:56AM
Best I can do is standing pose for now. If I do complicated pose all hell breaks lose. I kinda want them to do zombie walk pose. Guess it depends on the type of ai
LordVrane
04/10/23 06:01PM
Shazra said:
Best I can do is standing pose for now. If I do complicated pose all hell breaks lose. I kinda want them to do zombie walk pose. Guess it depends on the type of ai


Tried them myself by creating a 3D skeleton from the pose modifier, then used ControlNet to create the image. It was... semi all-right, although the image itself was disgusting (the pose, however, worked well); probably I didn't compiled the prompt correctly.

You could try with Controlenet -> Openpose, in case you still haven't.
Ezrael
04/16/23 02:00PM
Did anyone try training a LoRA from hypnohub's images?
GuileGaze
04/17/23 11:23PM
Ezrael said:
Did anyone try training a LoRA from hypnohub's images?


I made an one extremely quickly without any manual tagging (just used WD Tagger), but didn't get great results. Especially when dealing with eyes/expressions, you'll probably need to manually tag those in the images or the autotagger will miss them. Not to mention that you'll probably also want a lot of close-ups to properly train those small details.

I might try to go back to it though, especially because none of the models I've found can create a good expressionless/mindless look.
EdgeOfTheMoon
04/18/23 08:13AM
Did you not think to ask before using the pics on the site like that? I know several artists on the site have said they don't want their art used for AI training. Disrespecting that seems like a sure way to chase artists off the site
jigiyak
04/18/23 11:21AM
EdgeOfTheMoon said:
Did you not think to ask before using the pics on the site like that? I know several artists on the site have said they don't want their art used for AI training. Disrespecting that seems like a sure way to chase artists off the site


"won't somebody think of the artists"

ok, calm down helen
EdgeOfTheMoon
04/18/23 12:45PM
jigiyak said:
EdgeOfTheMoon said:
Did you not think to ask before using the pics on the site like that? I know several artists on the site have said they don't want their art used for AI training. Disrespecting that seems like a sure way to chase artists off the site


"won't somebody think of the artists"

ok, calm down helen


I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here.

A few artists made a very reasonable request about how their work is used. I think it's fair to respect that. Don't you?
Underscore
04/18/23 07:27PM
Jimmyting
04/20/23 01:49AM
Will there be a rule on idk, real life AI pics? Of like fake women or movie character women? Because some of it looks really good.
Will that happen in the foreseeable future?
Detour
04/20/23 03:55AM
We don't allow real life AI art.
jigiyak
04/20/23 05:15PM
wait you allow real life non ai hypno art?
1 2345>>>


Forum Index