Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 43365
Artist
- ? luckyluckyluckypenny 201
General
- ? androgynous 2026
- ? blush 37129
- ? crossdressing 1352
- ? dazed 12703
- ? diaper 1545
- ? drool 25461
- ? feminization 1466
- ? fishnets 2313
- ? happy trance 47029
- ? long hair 58530
- ? malesub 14107
- ? poofy diaper 76
- ? spiral eyes 24008
- ? symbol in eyes 32531
- ? tongue 19340
- ? tongue out 18539
- ? transformation 9680
- ? transgender 1946
Meta
- ? greyscale 10463
- ? monochrome 7668
- ? text 83858
- ? western 9320
Statistics
- Id: 12370
-
Posted: 2014-02-18 06:33:44
by buckethazard - Size: 1800x2200
- Source: luckyluckyluckypenny.devi...rt/Sissy-Teapot-431164753
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 63 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #10600
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10601
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10602
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10604
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10606
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I would think it works for girls...it would mean making them all submissive and stuff, just like it does guys.
If that were all being a sissy was, every pic would have that tag.
Edit: The dA page refers to the character as "her", which may not mean anything given the nature of the pic, but I'd say this should be tagged femsub.
>> #10608
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hmm, something there's I've always been uncertain about. Is sissification something only limited to boys or can it happen to girls too? I'm only asking now because this one has breasts.
Keep in mind the artist here.
Edit: The dA page refers to the character as "her", which may not mean anything given the nature of the pic, but I'd say this should be tagged femsub.
Hhhhehehe. Go through his gallery and reconsider. I'd just leave it untagged as far as that goes since it's waaaaaaaay questionable either way, though when he was drawing it I want to say he was probably thinking male. I do think an ambiguous_gender tag like e621 has would be a good idea.
>> #10609
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10610
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10611
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't see how females can be sissies. I thought the whole point of sissies were that they were feminized guys. That's what we have the tag defined as.
I sort of wish the world were progressive enough for sissification to apply to both genders... huh... I'm odd.
Keep in mind the artist here.
Not sure what this means.
>> #10613
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I know luckyluckyluckypenny does some transformation sissy stuff (see post 9943). Maybe this is more of that?
That would be my guess.
Not sure what this means.
Have you seen his gallery?