Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? wildfire (manipper) 20
General
- ? black hair 30962
- ? blonde hair 33721
- ? blush 37295
- ? breasts 105368
- ? brown eyes 6712
- ? cleavage 23276
- ? closed eyes 2144
- ? drool 25596
- ? femsub 134584
- ? french kiss 666
- ? group sex 1313
- ? incest 1350
- ? kissing 3163
- ? large breasts 58844
- ? long hair 58732
- ? maledom 36293
- ? multiple girls 16007
- ? sex 18138
- ? short hair 41448
- ? sisters 773
- ? smile 29140
- ? threesome 816
- ? vaginal 11411
Meta
- ? caption 8960
- ? caption only 2833
- ? manip 16723
- ? text 84188
>> #23332
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23334
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23426
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23474
Score: 0 (vote Up)
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...
I tried to come up with a witty explanation, but drew a blank. You're right, aside from "it's a law in Japan", there really is no logic behind it, huh? Can't be "protecting" the children. I mean, if it is an attempt to do so, than it fails before it begins, because this is porn. It seems to be "just because our society deems it unacceptable to have showing". Because, you know, censored porn is obviously used for far less nefarious purposes than uncensored porn.
>> #70539
Score: 0 (vote Up)
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...
Its for suspension of disbelief. So they can say "well its not 100% that..."