Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? sailor moon (series) 1342
Character
- ? sailor mercury 535
Artist
- ? arioncanvas 1
- ? vanndril (manipper) 192
General
- ? blue eyes 17408
- ? blue hair 13353
- ? blush 37129
- ? bottomless 41363
- ? breasts 104874
- ? chains 1235
- ? collar 13801
- ? dog pose 1068
- ? earrings 9084
- ? empty eyes 36612
- ? exhibitionism 1461
- ? femsub 133868
- ? happy trance 47029
- ? jewelry 9728
- ? large breasts 58672
- ? leash 1943
- ? nipples 16729
- ? nude 39267
- ? open clothes 5971
- ? pet play 4775
- ? short hair 41300
- ? squatting 3077
- ? tongue 19340
- ? tongue out 18539
- ? topless 45073
Meta
- ? manip 16689
Statistics
- Id: 18425
-
Posted: 2014-08-04 08:32:04
by Vanndril - Size: 1024x768
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=45048156
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 145 (vote up)
>> #24440
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Those eyes were harder to manip than they looked...
>> #24451
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24454
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait what happened to the original O_O
RIP
Rest In Pixiv
>> #24456
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait what happened to the original O_O
It wasn't (turtley) MC enough for the (turtle) MC club.
>> #24473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It wasn't (turtley) MC enough for the (turtle) MC club.
Really, I thought it fit right in. True she still had light in her eyes, but she was still acting like a dog while also being nude. somethings Ami is never really known to do.
>> #24476
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Really, I thought it fit right in. True she still had light in her eyes, but she was still acting like a dog while also being nude. somethings Ami is never really known to do.
the problem with that is, most known characters don't have sex either; would you think it was MC if she was kissing another girl, or wearing punk clothes? Porn makes 'what a character would do' unreliable
I still feel the original had MC elements, tho
>> #24488
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Porn makes 'what a character would do' unreliable
This. In hentai, even the strictest and straightest of characters become horny bisexual mega-sluts who are into really kinky things without even an ounce of MC. You really just can't go by that.
I still feel the original had MC elements, tho
Possibly. I wouldn't have it in my MC folders, personally, and I'm usually fairly lax about the requirements of an image being considered MC, as I have images there that aren't MC enough for the site because they look or feel MC to me. The potential MC elements of the original image were all far too subtle. It would be very hard to defend disallowing almost any image if that one were to have stayed in its unmanipped form.
In any case, unless you loved the eyes in the original (which I wouldn't blame you if you do, as they were gorgeously done), you all lost nothing in having me manip it to keep it up. I think it was a good solution. :P
>> #24495
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24498
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I didn't know you could remove one pic and put in another in its place, tags and score transferred to the new
You can. In fact, anybody (who can delete an image - say, the uploader) can, it's not just the admins. ;)
You just need to make the NEW pic the parent of the OLD pic. Then, when you delete the OLD pic, the parent (new) pic will receive everything that is transferred.
>> #24527
Score: 0 (vote Up)
You can. In fact, anybody (who can delete an image - say, the uploader) can, it's not just the admins. ;)
You just need to make the NEW pic the parent of the OLD pic. Then, when you delete the OLD pic, the parent (new) pic will receive everything that is transferred.
Niiiice
& manipulating the eyes was a good solution to both cutting off the pointless argument & keeping the picture, but a part of me is frustrated with the dichotomous standard & bureaucratic thinking it represents