Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? homestuck 360
- ? ms paint adventures 237
Character
- ? the condesce 14
- ? vriska serket 63
Artist
- ? unholybear 1
General
- ? alien 2747
- ? black hair 30958
- ? femdom 30460
- ? femsub 134561
- ? glasses 10282
- ? horns 7228
- ? very long hair 4557
- ? yuri 6423
Meta
- ? western 9327
Statistics
- Id: 24397
-
Posted: 2015-03-22 08:47:43
by Vraska - Size: 1280x1067
- Source: glub-on-it.tumblr.com/post/60169817465
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 41 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #50261
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50285
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50300
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #50302
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Is the sub underage? If so, this probably deserves the loli tag.
No, no, no. That's not how the tag works.
>> #50354
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Having read the tag description, it specifically mentions girls who appear prepubescent. Is that why the loli tag is not applicable here?
>> #50417
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I try to help Hypnohub, but always just seem make things worse. :-/
Having read the tag description, it specifically mentions girls who appear prepubescent. Is that why the loli tag is not applicable here?
She's a teenager in her source comic.
>> #50420
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I try to help Hypnohub, but always just seem make things worse. :-/
Having read the tag description, it specifically mentions girls who appear prepubescent. Is that why the loli tag is not applicable here?
Generally speaking, loli is a body type, not an age. So yup, any character that appears to be prepubescent, regardless of what their source says about their age, is considered loli. Likewise, characters considered to be young in the source material but still have developed bodies do not qualify as loli. Hope that clarifies!
>> #61425
Score: 1 (vote Up)