Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? touhou 2376
Character
- ? flandre scarlet 58
Artist
- ? kenpi 23
General
- ? blonde hair 33555
- ? blush 37140
- ? bottomless 41382
- ? dazed 12709
- ? empty eyes 36619
- ? expressionless 20657
- ? female only 57880
- ? femsub 133918
- ? hat 7172
- ? heart 11419
- ? heart eyes 9623
- ? long hair 58556
- ? open clothes 5974
- ? panties 8479
- ? ponytail 12490
- ? shirt lift 1722
- ? sweat 11450
- ? symbol in eyes 32545
- ? underwear 11499
- ? wings 3618
Meta
- ? text 83887
- ? translation request 7921
Statistics
- Id: 28078
-
Posted: 2015-08-04 01:10:14
by Mindwipe - Size: 777x1087
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=51770332
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 53 (vote up)
>> #65714
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65718
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Need lolicon tag.
No it doesn't. That body is not the body of a loli.
>> #65723
Score: 0 (vote Up)
No it doesn't. That body is not the body of a loli.
I politely disagree. It does look underage to me - not outright "child", but nowhere near "adult".
Better to be safe than sorry.
>> #65724
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65725
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #65734
Score: 0 (vote Up)
And I'm going to keep removing the tag, because she is far too developed in this pic to be a loli. She has very clearly-defined breasts and wide hips. Lolis have flat chests and practically no curve to their figure at all. Honestly, the breasts alone disqualify this from being loli.
... Then I'm just going to keep re-adding it, because there is seriously no way in hell she *isn't* loli.
Yes, there are breasts. Girls can start getting breasts as early as 8 years old, so that's precisely ZERO indication of adulthood.
And wide hips? They still look decisively little-girl to me.
>> #65735
Score: 0 (vote Up)
... Then I'm just going to keep re-adding it, because there is seriously no way in hell she *isn't* loli.
Yes, there are breasts. Girls can start getting breasts as early as 8 years old, so that's precisely ZERO indication of adulthood.
And wide hips? They still look decisively little-girl to me.
This does not fit our tag definition for <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli.>> There's some pretty significant curvature on her.
>> #65738
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This does not fit our tag definition for <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=loli|loli.>> There's some pretty significant curvature on her.
Then there's a bunch of other pictures that should have the Loli tag removed as well - too many that I cba to list them all.
And I still argue it fits "looks prepubescent" to a T. "generally marked by" =/= "always has this".
>> #65739
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Then there's a bunch of other pictures that should have the Loli tag removed as well - too many that I cba to list them all.
Again, other pictures having the tag, do not qualify as a valid reason for this one getting it as well. It's a case by case decision, with the rules clearly outlined. If you see other pictures that do not deserve the loli tag, remove it and add a comment.
>> #65740
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Again, other pictures having the tag, do not qualify as a valid reason for this one getting it as well. It's a case by case decision, with the rules clearly outlined. If you see other pictures that do not deserve the loli tag, remove it and add a comment.
Except I'm arguing the other way in this case - this picture needs a loli tag because she (to me, at least) appears prepubescent. This is then verified by other pictures that have already gotten a loli tag and have roughly the same build of body.