Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? alien (movie) 91
Character
- ? xenomorph 78
Artist
- ? princesslucina (manipper) 102
General
- ? alien 2741
- ? black hair 30862
- ? breasts 104874
- ? death 209
- ? femdom 30351
- ? large breasts 58671
- ? long hair 58529
- ? pendulum 11927
Meta
- ? caption 8944
- ? manip 16689
- ? text 83858
Statistics
- Id: 30164
-
Posted: 2015-10-14 00:30:19
by PrincessLucina - Size: 1202x888
- Source: www.gelbooru.com/index.ph...&s=view&id=891160
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 56 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #73664
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #73677
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #73681
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #73690
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #73692
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Wait wait wait...how the FUCK did she hypnotize an automated security system? I call ALL the bullshit.
There were humans behind the camera, dear.
>> #73693
Score: 0 (vote Up)
There were humans behind the camera, dear.
how many do you think are still alive?
>> #73694
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait wait wait...how the FUCK did she hypnotize an automated security system? I call ALL the bullshit.
There were humans behind the camera, dear.
Heh. I guess I've found EoD's weakness! Manips requiring logic and reasoning!
>> #73695
Score: 0 (vote Up)
how many do you think are still alive?
If I had to guess....Maybe one. Maybe.
>> #73701
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Heh. I guess I've found EoD's weakness! Manips requiring logic and reasoning!
Actually true. If something seems illogical or contradicts the source material's canon, it utterly breaks my suspension of disbelief.
There were humans behind the camera, dear.
Having reread it the blue dialogue gives no indication of it being human in nature. It's in all caps while text we KNOW is coming for a human(ish) source uses capitalization properly, and the tone comes off as mechanical in nature. Further, fail safe systems such as this are not manually controlled. They have manual overrides, but they're just that. Overrides. There is no indication of a person overriding the fail safe.
So while the manipper's intent may have been it was a human sealing the door, not only was it not portrayed properly, but it goes against actual fail safe procedure.
Good image, interesting idea, poor execution.
>> #73702
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Actually true. If something seems illogical or contradicts the source material's canon, it utterly breaks my suspension of disbelief.
Having reread it the blue dialogue gives no indication of it being human in nature. It's in all caps while text we KNOW is coming for a human(ish) source uses capitalization properly, and the tone comes off as mechanical in nature. Further, fail safe systems such as this are not manually controlled. They have manual overrides, but they're just that. Overrides. There is no indication of a person overriding the fail safe.
So while the manipper's intent may have been it was a human sealing the door, not only was it not portrayed properly, but it goes against actual fail safe procedure.
Good image, interesting idea, poor execution.
Objection! Your honor, the witness is clearly grasping for straws here! Allow me to explain!
*Slams photo on desk*
The testimony, contradicts THIS evidence!
As you can see here, this is a wonderfully executed manip picture, taking place in an area that holds the nature of a spin-off. Of course not to be considered canon material!
Furthermore.....*Slams hands on desk* Judging by the evidence in the comments section, many people ASIDE from the witness enjoy AND understand this manip as it was written, therefore, the only true answer.....*Points dramatically* Is that YOU, EoD, are guilty of not understanding a manip and are trying to pin the blame on the manniper, PrincessLucina! You're nothing more than a butthurt keyboard warrior trying to ruin other people's fun because you got called out on not knowing something! Time to pay for your crimes! TAKE THAT!