Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? overwatch 1346
Character
- ? mei (overwatch) 154
General
- ? bare legs 3811
- ? barefoot 12088
- ? bottomless 41360
- ? bracelet 1485
- ? breasts 104873
- ? brown eyes 6685
- ? brown hair 29653
- ? clothed exposure 4341
- ? feet 9112
- ? femdom 30350
- ? glasses 10251
- ? hair buns 1426
- ? hair ornament 3993
- ? huge breasts 22494
- ? hypnotic breasts 1116
- ? jewelry 9727
- ? large breasts 58671
- ? legs 3687
- ? looking at viewer 12777
- ? nipples 16724
- ? pov 8663
- ? pov sub 5032
- ? spread legs 8997
Meta
- ? caption 8943
- ? dialogue 23468
- ? manip 16689
- ? text 83855
Statistics
- Id: 37395
-
Posted: 2016-06-07 05:27:42
by Souless - Size: 701x482
- Source: pht.sg/tu/hardinkgirls/138634717008
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 90 (vote up)
>> #108153
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #108160
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Calm down, QCC will decide whether or not to delete it. I don't think it's bad, but it is pretty simple. It reminds me of all of the old caption-only manips that were all over the place a few years ago.
First day posting, should I not post these?
>> #108167
Score: 0 (vote Up)
First day posting, should I not post these?
They're a bit...low effort. A text-only manip can work, but it generally needs to be some pretty high quality writing, and even the font choice can make a big difference. This... I mean, not to be rude, but it's a bit amateurish. The writing is more or less txt-speak, and doesn't do much in the way of setting the scene, nor the mood (personal opinion as someone who's critiqued a lot of writing). Composition-wise, it's just sort of...thrown together. I mean, I've had images like that as well, but aside from basic rules like "Don't just MSPaint a solid colour over someone's eyes and call it hypnobadoozled.", there's a pretty basic idea that the more work shown put into an image, the more favourably - and forgivingly - it will be received. Always assume that a concept will work worse as an image than it did as an idea in your head, because your imagination will always fill in a bunch of sexy details you weren't consciously thinking about.
>> #108175
Score: 0 (vote Up)
First day posting, should I not post these?
It's fine to post them, the QCC will just take a look at some of these but don't get demoralised, just think of what you can do to improve (or post a thread on the forums asking for advice) and keep going!
A lot of what DanGambino said is true though, even a caption-only manip can improved by including details like the setting or by describing a character's thoughts and actions - just basic story telling skills.
>> #108192
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #108222
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #108409
Score: 0 (vote Up)
They're a bit...low effort.
Not going against you, at least not solely, but I probably need to talk with our admin team to get that phrase banned from the comments. I know, I am guilty of using it myself in the past, but in all honesty, you can't apply the time it takes yourself to do something to someone else's manip. It's discouraging, unfair and can make the whole comment section toxic instead of helpful. Everyone that take the time to actually create something for the community should never hear that he put no effort into his/her work.
If anything, please use something like "you could improve at ...". The rest of your comment is pretty good, I'd just have prefered you left out the first sentence.
You misspelled the character's name as the first word in the caption, and the second word is also wrong.
A tipp for everyone. There are grammar checkers available online. Copy/paste your text in there then go through it line by line. It helps minimizing typos. Otherwise, our forum has been used in the past for proofreading, so feel free to ask other users there.
First day posting, should I not post these?
You should have, by all means posted it here. Personally, I'd combine the feedback you get here and create a v2. The scores can be transfered to the updated version by making the new picture the parent post of this one, then deleting this picture. For your first post, you should mostly expect to get some people to ask for improvements till it can stay, but once you get the hang of it, this will not be an issue in the future. :)
>> #108701
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm going to let the QCC take a looksy at this and make the determination.
>> #114615
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #114618
Score: 0 (vote Up)
its....so....OUT OF CHARACTER
Or maybe she's faking it in game! DUH NUH!!!