Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? nintendo 22305
- ? pokemon 14167
Character
- ? alolan vulpix 19
- ? pokemon (creature) 2451
- ? vulpix 43
Artist
- ? poketizer (manipper) 21
General
- ? animals only 1497
- ? femdom 30735
- ? femsub 136211
- ? furry 18382
- ? hair ribbon 1482
- ? hypnotized hypnotist 3860
- ? looking at viewer 12987
- ? pink eyes 8744
- ? pov 8821
- ? pov sub 5095
- ? ribbon 3185
Meta
- ? caption 9010
- ? manip 16849
- ? text 85073
Statistics
- Id: 43411
-
Posted: 2016-12-29 16:07:12
by Poketizer - Size: 1700x1000
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...ium&illust_id=5821301
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 46 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #146951
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146955
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146956
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ALERT! ALERT! CUTENESS OVERLOAD! TOO MUCH CUTE TO COMPREHEND! *melts*
*takes note of that*
>> #146957
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146961
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146972
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ALERT! ALERT! CUTENESS OVERLOAD! TOO MUCH CUTE TO COMPREHEND! *melts*
So adorable I just want to squeeze and pet it @.@
>> #146979
Score: 0 (vote Up)
FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME, TAG YOUR WEIRD FURSHIT
THANKS
Wouldn't that only apply if Vulpi was anthro? I quote from the 'furry' tag page:
"Characters that are almost entirely animal in nature - ones that don't have a particularly human body shape, don't have human hands, etc. - do not receive this tag."
While the animals_only tag applies here, the furry tag doesn't.
>> #146980
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146985
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hey, WhatIsLove, we had a guy here before who used to post the exact same thing on furry pics. He's banned for 2000 years. So try to cool it, okay?
Ya don't think... Nah, couldn't be......
>> #147157
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ya don't think... Nah, couldn't be......
Did you guys make sure it twas an IP ban, out of curiousity?