Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? overwatch 1346
Character
- ? mei (overwatch) 154
- ? tracer 352
Artist
- ? deeezel 3
General
- ? bent over 1146
- ? blush 37126
- ? bodysuit 6748
- ? bottomless 41360
- ? breast press 1792
- ? breasts 104873
- ? brown hair 29652
- ? embarrassed 1246
- ? femsub 133857
- ? futa with female 834
- ? futadom 1881
- ? futanari 5412
- ? glasses 10251
- ? gloves 14884
- ? groping 4146
- ? hair ornament 3993
- ? huge breasts 22494
- ? lipstick 6260
- ? looking at viewer 12777
- ? looking back 1638
- ? makeup 3358
- ? multiple girls 15900
- ? nude 39263
- ? orange eyes 1775
- ? panties 8476
- ? penis 27200
- ? sex 18013
- ? short hair 41298
- ? sideboob 1141
- ? smile 29015
- ? sweat 11447
- ? thong 1965
- ? topless 45070
- ? underwear 11496
Statistics
- Id: 43533
-
Posted: 2017-01-02 20:08:15
by Zementblock - Size: 672x880
- Source: danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2360885
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 53 (vote up)
>> #147838
Score: 0 (vote Up)
What I'm confused about is "how". I mean that's a ridiculous amount of tags, most of which are unofficial and should be removed (done now), but that shouldn't be causing this to happen...
Also the thumbnail is still showing up so the flag shouldn't result in removal quite yet.
>> #147841
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Honestly, this...is extremely puzzling
>> #147845
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Knowing that, my best guess is that there was some kind of glitch due to the filename they uploaded having the hash already in it (danbooru.donmai.us/data/_...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png to 404'd hypnohub.net//data/image/...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png)
>> #147890
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #148168
Score: 0 (vote Up)
As I suspected, it's a copy from danbooru. danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2360885
Knowing that, my best guess is that there was some kind of glitch due to the filename they uploaded having the hash already in it (danbooru.donmai.us/data/_...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png to 404'd hypnohub.net//data/image/...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png)
That shouldn't be an issue. The software converts the image name to its MD5 hash. The hash already being part of the filename shouldn't get in the way of that. But who really knows, I guess.
It's not the first time a post was uploaded where the actual image file was never actually uploaded despite the thumbnail being successfully made. I'll have to keep an eye on the original filenames if I know the sources to see if it really is a naming issue.
I'll fix this manually.
Edit: Done.
_________________________________________
Now, more importantly, I'm not very familiar with the source. so... Can anyone explain how this is MC?