Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? rwby 1593
Character
- ? ruby rose 425
- ? weiss schnee 385
Artist
- ? iesupa 2
- ? litter (manipper) 15
General
- ? black hair 30926
- ? blue eyes 17478
- ? blush 37240
- ? clothed 7620
- ? consensual 1446
- ? dress 4725
- ? female only 58025
- ? ponytail 12548
- ? short hair 41393
- ? side ponytail 1112
- ? smile 29105
- ? white hair 8291
- ? wholesome 596
- ? yuri 6416
Meta
- ? absurdres 34925
- ? caption 8953
- ? manip 16712
- ? text 84052
Statistics
- Id: 65913
-
Posted: 2018-06-22 23:32:36
by Litter - Size: 5000x1925
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=50297922
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 35 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #266686
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I hope you like reading.
>> #266798
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #266819
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are they underage?
No they are teenagers
>> #266865
Score: 0 (vote Up)
(also, unrelated note: the "underage" tag is covered in scope by "loli" and "shota" and thus redundant. I removed that a while ago.)
Ruby and Weiss are "of age", but the characters in this image sure as heck don't *look* like them.
>> #267284
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Are they underage?
Even if they are underage, posts of illustrated characters do not warrant for a flag.
If they were underage images of real children or teens, that would be a completely different issue.
>> #267473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #343695
Score: 0 (vote Up)
No they are teenagers
*facepalm* That's like saying "No, grapes aren't fruit, they're berries." IDK why Chrislangster even asked when they're so obviously kids.