Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? idolmaster cinderella girls 267
- ? the idolm@ster 831
Character
- ? mika jougasaki 13
Artist
- ? whippoorwill (manipper) 13
- ? yang-do 4
General
- ? belt 1701
- ? bracelet 1485
- ? breasts 104873
- ? cleavage 23185
- ? femdom 30350
- ? fishnets 2313
- ? hypnotic breasts 1116
- ? hypnotic gas 1539
- ? jewelry 9728
- ? large breasts 58671
- ? looking at viewer 12777
- ? necklace 3607
- ? perfume 43
- ? pink hair 10539
- ? pov 8663
- ? pov sub 5032
- ? prostitution 916
- ? sweat 11447
Meta
- ? caption 8943
- ? caption only 2827
- ? manip 16689
- ? text 83856
Statistics
- Id: 71714
-
Posted: 2018-11-18 00:45:02
by whippoorwill - Size: 2124x1412
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 309 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #290383
Score: 1 (vote Up)
How long until it gets deleted for too much text?
>> #290390
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Nice manip.
How long until it gets deleted for too much text?
I hate that new rule, the majority of the things I jack off to here are mostly text based
>> #290397
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #290408
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #290413
Score: 0 (vote Up)
People work hard on these. This manip is normally outside my comfort zone/norm but I rather like it.
>> #290414
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Same, still miffed that Shantae pool got taken down.
Same, still miffed that Shantae pool got taken down.
Is it uploaded anywhere else?
>> #290431
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #290464
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ahhhh, dang it. Didn't see that rule. Well, I guess we'll find out how long it lasts together.
I tried to read up on this and my impression is the mods made it sound worse than it was, and rather than being a hard and fast rule it's more of a guideline. Ie if the manip is more than x% text or doesn't have paragraphs it needs to be better-written to make up for it. Anyway I think you'll be fine.
>> #290467
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Either way, I'll go a little less ham on the writing from here, if it avoids pushing any lines.
Also thank you!
>> #290478
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ah, ok, gotcha. Sounds like it's more of an avoiding hard-to-read-walls-of-text thing then?
Either way, I'll go a little less ham on the writing from here, if it avoids pushing any lines.
Also thank you!
Part that. Overall they wanted to be more strict applying quality standards to caption_only posts. In a way it makes sense because non-caption images had pretty clear standards but caption posts did not. (Buuut I'm not sure it's more clear now lol)
I say don't censor yourself and make what you like, and if it somehow gets removed either you can make it better or it was already good and you can find people to commiserate with about it.