Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? fate/grand order 1890
- ? fate (series) 2520
Character
- ? florence nightingale 40
- ? minamoto no raikou 102
Artist
- ? ni crying 19
- ? nobody67 (manipper) 72
General
- ? aphrodisiac 230
- ? bikini 5059
- ? breasts 104885
- ? cameltoe 2041
- ? clothed exposure 4341
- ? femdom 30359
- ? high heels 10186
- ? huge breasts 22502
- ? hypnotic drug 884
- ? injection 710
- ? kneeling 7305
- ? large breasts 58682
- ? long hair 58541
- ? looking at viewer 12782
- ? micro bikini 1410
- ? needle 450
- ? pov 8666
- ? pov sub 5033
- ? purple hair 11385
- ? see-through 2384
- ? spread legs 9002
- ? syringe 311
- ? thighhighs 17837
Meta
- ? caption 8944
- ? caption only 2827
- ? manip 16689
- ? text 83870
Statistics
- Id: 76123
-
Posted: 2019-03-07 23:46:45
by Nobody67 - Size: 1850x1100
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=65644679
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 175 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #307696
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307697
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307699
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307763
Score: 0 (vote Up)
thats a dick move
I mean, she never technically lied: she says that one syringe contains "sub" serum (technically true, but so does the other one), and then says "if you were to take 'dom' serum..." NOT that the other syringe has "dom" serum.
But still, yes, definitely a dick move.
>> #307788
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307791
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #307792
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Joke's on her - both of them would be sub because that's not how you use a darn antidote, stupid lil big-tiddy BEEYATCH
I mean... you're not fucking wrong.....
>> #307944
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm getting serious Princess Bride vibes here.....
[spoiler=sub serum]iocane powder[/spoiler]
>> #307992
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I'm getting serious Princess Bride vibes here.....
didn't the guy who wrote that book die in January?
>> #349283
Score: 0 (vote Up)
[spoiler=sub serum]iocane powder[/spoiler]
Finally somebody else who understands the reference! Too bad you got to the post before me...