Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? my little pony 3321
Character
- ? applejack 304
- ? derpy hooves 39
- ? fluttershy 439
- ? pinkie pie 323
- ? rainbow dash 388
- ? rarity 431
- ? twilight sparkle 787
Artist
- ? mcaesar (manipper) 25
- ? trishbot 215
General
- ? barefoot 12169
- ? blonde hair 33796
- ? bottomless 41631
- ? breasts 105522
- ? cowgirl 179
- ? discolored nipples 875
- ? expressionless 20799
- ? feet 9184
- ? femsub 134889
- ? freckles 2008
- ? hat 7200
- ? horns 7239
- ? hypnotic eyes 10185
- ? kaa eyes 12929
- ? large breasts 58897
- ? long hair 58822
- ? maledom 36424
- ? multicolored hair 6455
- ? nipples 17042
- ? nude 39638
- ? open mouth 47840
- ? personification 569
- ? pink hair 10587
- ? standing 12815
- ? standing at attention 5831
- ? straight-cut bangs 1267
- ? topless 45336
- ? wings 3632
Meta
- ? caption 8965
- ? manip 16757
- ? text 84410
- ? western 9328
Statistics
- Id: 9858
-
Posted: 2013-09-30 00:28:53
by Reccy - Size: 2016x1200
- Source: trishbot.deviantart.com/a...Playthings-NSFW-259371349
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 45 (vote up)
This post belongs to a
parent post.
Child posts are often subsequent pages of a doujinshi, or minor variations of the parent post.
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #2006
Score: 0 (vote Up)
sleepymaid.com/chan/furry/res/1047.html#1097
How was my tagging?
>> #2008
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #2010
Score: 0 (vote Up)
How was my tagging?
Good enough that I copied them onto the other 2 versions of this pic (you left off the artist, btw). I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
>> #2013
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #2017
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Good enough that I copied them onto the other 2 versions of this pic (you left off the artist, btw). I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
Alright, thank you MindWipe!
>> #192928
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't think there's enough to call this "furry", though. So, I removed that tag and replaced it with "personification", because they look mostly human.
Apparently someone put the furry tag back. That said, I think there IS enough to call this furry, so take that as you will.
>> #192930
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Apparently someone put the furry tag back. That said, I think there IS enough to call this furry, so take that as you will.
Disagreed. The skin color is clearly just skin color, a few of them have skin that's shining in a way fur definitely wouldn't. And I don't think tails and wings and colored skin qualify for furry.