I don't mind one tweet's worth of text if * Typographically it's more involved than just picking a font, color, and size, or * There's any non-caption manipping whatsoever, even just a little eye dulling or something.
If this is seriously okay then I might as well just make a generic speech-bubble template that I can throw a tweet into and re-up the <<chan.sankakucomplex.com/?tags=order%3Apopular|sankaku popular list>> as "manips". Which to be clear, I don't mind people enjoying that stuff, but that's trivially easy to just do in one's imagination. My bar for what constitutes a manip is very low, but I feel like there should be some kind of bar, otherwise it threatens to notably dilute the content of this particular site as something worth going to for any reason, instead of just going to another booru with a higher uploader population which has all the same stuff just without tweets in the corner.
I know saying that in general over a single post is a slippery-slope fallacy; but don't nobody say I didn't warn ya.
EoD said: Serious question here. Mike Inel and Manyakis are the same person. Why do we have both of them as an artist tag? There's even an image with both names tagged as the artist.
I wasn't aware of that - I'll add the tag !
greasyi said: I think the QC team should take a look at this - Plain-gray words in the corner of an image, that all fit together in one tweet (I checked), with the most vague and generic MC theming one could possibly come up with, kind of pushes the boundaries of caption_only.
I consider that one does not need to fill a picture with one thousand effects in order to make a good MC manip - as a matter of fact, sometimes the less the better. This was the idea here (a bit out of lazyness, I'll admit). I chose not to write too much, because they would have "invaded" too much the animation in my eyes, and removed the ambiguity, which I was exactly aiming for. The word positioning follows the same idea - to add a little spice that changes a simple animation into a MC-oriented one. As for the gray color... At first I wanted to go green, to suggest a computer (and programming) theme, but Gimp turned everything to gray ^^"
Bokasa said: Hmm...it will be much better if you slow down frames.
Got it. I'll post a slower version (I'll try today ^^")
Serious question here. Mike Inel and Manyakis are the same person. Why do we have both of them as an artist tag? There's even an image with both names tagged as the artist.
I think the QC team should take a look at this - Plain-gray words in the corner of an image, that all fit together in one tweet (I checked), with the most vague and generic MC theming one could possibly come up with, kind of pushes the boundaries of caption_only. (And if there's any other edits, they're too subtle for me to notice; even the between-frame static looks the same, at least at full speed.)
I had a few April Fool's posts favorited that got deleted which had more MC theme and effort than this.
Date Apr 30, 2016UserDroolRating SafeScore111(vote up)
RedCollarBlackCollar said: While I can agree to the extent of "shoes" being far too broad and somewhat insignificant, specific shoes are definitely worth labeling. "High_heels" for example I'm a huge fan of, and love finding certain pics that fit the kind I look for, as there of course tend to be variations between them.
High heels make sense. Shoes don't in my opinion. Anyway, makes no difference - just an observation that there are many tags.
Suggestions for what these characters could get up to next?
Mindwipe said: We actually do tag hair. Not jut "hair", but things like "long_hair", "blonde_hair", "pubic_hair", etc. And we have specific tags for pics NOT involving humans. We also have tags for "dark_skin", "blue_skin", "green_skin", etc.
There's plenty of reasons for it. One is that everyone has different kinks. For example, some people have a thing for shoes. Some people have a thing for NO shoes. And the tag allows both people to find what they like. It's also just another tag that can be used to narrow down a search when you're looking for a specific images. It's hard to have too many tags. It's very easy to have too few.
While I can agree to the extent of "shoes" being far too broad and somewhat insignificant, specific shoes are definitely worth labeling. "High_heels" for example I'm a huge fan of, and love finding certain pics that fit the kind I look for, as there of course tend to be variations between them.
112947 said: If you tag shoes you might as well tag skin, hair, humans, people. Waste of time.
We actually do tag hair. Not jut "hair", but things like "long_hair", "blonde_hair", "pubic_hair", etc. And we have specific tags for pics NOT involving humans. We also have tags for "dark_skin", "blue_skin", "green_skin", etc.
There's plenty of reasons for it. One is that everyone has different kinks. For example, some people have a thing for shoes. Some people have a thing for NO shoes. And the tag allows both people to find what they like. It's also just another tag that can be used to narrow down a search when you're looking for a specific images. It's hard to have too many tags. It's very easy to have too few.
112947 said: If you tag shoes you might as well tag skin, hair, humans, people. Waste of time.
Obviously some tags are pointless (we aren't gonna tag hypnosis on this booru, for instance). But say an image had a person without skin or hair. Or didn't have humans in it. That information makes it much easier to find the image later if it's tagged, so we would tag it.
Or in the case of shoes, there's plenty of images that are barefoot, and plenty that have shoes. One isn't the 'default', so it makes sense to tag both cases.
I went ahead and removed the "coils" and "midriff" tags for you, as neither applies here. The site definitely these tags as such.
Coils: A character is wrapped up in a snake/naga's tail.
Midriff: Belly is exposed while rest (breasts/legs) is clothed. "Do not use if character is nude." (direct quote)
The "ass" tag is also debatable, as only part of an ass is shown, but I think it still applies. Similarly, "hypnohub_screen" is, imo, non-applicability, as it's just a spiral background, hypnotizing no one. But again, I guess it technically applies.
liked this until I saw that the middle one has a thigh gap as if she'd have normal legs otherwise but a snake tail was grafted onto the stumps or something 4/10
Date Apr 30, 2016UserTheGoodShankRating QuestionableScore48(vote up)
112947 said: Damn near perfect. Love your expressions and you get the situation made clear even by using a quick sketchy style. Let us know your commission rates and thanks for posting.
Often times the artist isn't the person who uploaded the image.
112947 said: Damn near perfect. Love your expressions and you get the situation made clear even by using a quick sketchy style. Let us know your commission rates and thanks for posting.
Too right mate, I love it. It has so much energy in it!
Damn near perfect. Love your expressions and you get the situation made clear even by using a quick sketchy style. Let us know your commission rates and thanks for posting.
Date Apr 30, 2016UserAmentibusRating SafeScore19(vote up)
www.lumendatabase.org/notices/10294491 ^ Here a list of sites where you can watch this episode :) It's Sailor Moon - Season 1 Episode 20 (it starts with three of them in the woods and getting into a rain shower)
Legotroop830
2016-06-30 05:33:15>> #111993
Legotroop830
2016-06-30 05:33:12>> #111992
Pinkanator
2016-05-01 14:06:28>> #101719
Muffins put down the remote!
<Calling her Muffins.
Gtfo.
HiddenAgenda
2016-05-01 12:50:56>> #101705
pokemongirl
2016-05-01 08:50:41>> #101658
greasyi
2016-05-03 06:19:44>> #102020
* Typographically it's more involved than just picking a font, color, and size, or
* There's any non-caption manipping whatsoever, even just a little eye dulling or something.
If this is seriously okay then I might as well just make a generic speech-bubble template that I can throw a tweet into and re-up the <<chan.sankakucomplex.com/?tags=order%3Apopular|sankaku popular list>> as "manips". Which to be clear, I don't mind people enjoying that stuff, but that's trivially easy to just do in one's imagination. My bar for what constitutes a manip is very low, but I feel like there should be some kind of bar, otherwise it threatens to notably dilute the content of this particular site as something worth going to for any reason, instead of just going to another booru with a higher uploader population which has all the same stuff just without tweets in the corner.
I know saying that in general over a single post is a slippery-slope fallacy; but don't nobody say I didn't warn ya.
Kayvaan
2016-05-01 11:45:33>> #101701
Serious question here. Mike Inel and Manyakis are the same person. Why do we have both of them as an artist tag? There's even an image with both names tagged as the artist.
I wasn't aware of that - I'll add the tag !
I think the QC team should take a look at this - Plain-gray words in the corner of an image, that all fit together in one tweet (I checked), with the most vague and generic MC theming one could possibly come up with, kind of pushes the boundaries of caption_only.
I consider that one does not need to fill a picture with one thousand effects in order to make a good MC manip - as a matter of fact, sometimes the less the better. This was the idea here (a bit out of lazyness, I'll admit). I chose not to write too much, because they would have "invaded" too much the animation in my eyes, and removed the ambiguity, which I was exactly aiming for.
The word positioning follows the same idea - to add a little spice that changes a simple animation into a MC-oriented one. As for the gray color... At first I wanted to go green, to suggest a computer (and programming) theme, but Gimp turned everything to gray ^^"
Hmm...it will be much better if you slow down frames.
Got it. I'll post a slower version (I'll try today ^^")
pokemongirl
2016-05-01 08:51:31>> #101659
EoD
2016-05-01 04:51:01>> #101631
greasyi
2016-05-01 02:17:51>> #101605
I had a few April Fool's posts favorited that got deleted which had more MC theme and effort than this.
Relanor
2016-09-16 18:24:38>> #125674
volco
2016-05-02 01:46:28>> #101803
domme Peach is so hot @.@
Agreed.
Nonymous
2016-05-01 13:10:19>> #101712
nalak
2016-05-01 09:33:03>> #101673
Not to be a killjoy or anything, but why hasn't she just used that on Bowser?
Maybe she's not interested in Bowser, or feels having Bowser suddenly be her devoted servant would cause too many problems.
hypnotoad
2016-05-01 03:46:49>> #101622
Not to be a killjoy or anything, but why hasn't she just used that on Bowser?
Pretty sure Peach is into kidnapping.
112947
2016-05-01 09:56:59>> #101683
While I can agree to the extent of "shoes" being far too broad and somewhat insignificant, specific shoes are definitely worth labeling. "High_heels" for example I'm a huge fan of, and love finding certain pics that fit the kind I look for, as there of course tend to be variations between them.
High heels make sense. Shoes don't in my opinion. Anyway, makes no difference - just an observation that there are many tags.
Suggestions for what these characters could get up to next?
RedCollarBlackCollar
2016-05-01 05:54:37>> #101640
We actually do tag hair. Not jut "hair", but things like "long_hair", "blonde_hair", "pubic_hair", etc. And we have specific tags for pics NOT involving humans. We also have tags for "dark_skin", "blue_skin", "green_skin", etc.
There's plenty of reasons for it. One is that everyone has different kinks. For example, some people have a thing for shoes. Some people have a thing for NO shoes. And the tag allows both people to find what they like. It's also just another tag that can be used to narrow down a search when you're looking for a specific images. It's hard to have too many tags. It's very easy to have too few.
While I can agree to the extent of "shoes" being far too broad and somewhat insignificant, specific shoes are definitely worth labeling. "High_heels" for example I'm a huge fan of, and love finding certain pics that fit the kind I look for, as there of course tend to be variations between them.
Mindwipe
2016-05-01 03:43:04>> #101621
If you tag shoes you might as well tag skin, hair, humans, people. Waste of time.
We actually do tag hair. Not jut "hair", but things like "long_hair", "blonde_hair", "pubic_hair", etc. And we have specific tags for pics NOT involving humans. We also have tags for "dark_skin", "blue_skin", "green_skin", etc.
There's plenty of reasons for it. One is that everyone has different kinks. For example, some people have a thing for shoes. Some people have a thing for NO shoes. And the tag allows both people to find what they like. It's also just another tag that can be used to narrow down a search when you're looking for a specific images. It's hard to have too many tags. It's very easy to have too few.
plsignore
2016-05-01 03:38:22>> #101620
If you tag shoes you might as well tag skin, hair, humans, people. Waste of time.
Obviously some tags are pointless (we aren't gonna tag hypnosis on this booru, for instance). But say an image had a person without skin or hair. Or didn't have humans in it. That information makes it much easier to find the image later if it's tagged, so we would tag it.
Or in the case of shoes, there's plenty of images that are barefoot, and plenty that have shoes. One isn't the 'default', so it makes sense to tag both cases.
112947
2016-05-01 03:30:27>> #101619
You'd be very wrong about both those things.
If you tag shoes you might as well tag skin, hair, humans, people. Waste of time.
Jeffb
2020-02-21 11:04:56>> #356908
Coils: A character is wrapped up in a snake/naga's tail.
Midriff: Belly is exposed while rest (breasts/legs) is clothed. "Do not use if character is nude." (direct quote)
The "ass" tag is also debatable, as only part of an ass is shown, but I think it still applies. Similarly, "hypnohub_screen" is, imo, non-applicability, as it's just a spiral background, hypnotizing no one. But again, I guess it technically applies.
Defcon7
2016-12-20 03:51:35>> #145248
plsignore
2016-05-01 01:51:03>> #101604
what does that mean? I mean, I know what that means, I'm just wondering why you're flagging it.
dwarfhunter
2016-05-01 00:36:56>> #101587
IvoryScratch
2016-04-30 23:43:25>> #101581
SomeCallMeSalty
2016-05-01 01:27:22>> #101598
Damn near perfect. Love your expressions and you get the situation made clear even by using a quick sketchy style. Let us know your commission rates and thanks for posting.
Often times the artist isn't the person who uploaded the image.
RelaxDude
2016-04-30 12:08:29>> #101519
Damn near perfect. Love your expressions and you get the situation made clear even by using a quick sketchy style. Let us know your commission rates and thanks for posting.
Too right mate, I love it. It has so much energy in it!
112947
2016-04-30 12:01:57>> #101518
endgame
2016-05-13 05:24:21>> #103629
<endgame> tl;dr - have a sad cum
Siithichan
2016-05-03 02:25:39>> #102000
^ Here a list of sites where you can watch this episode :)
It's Sailor Moon - Season 1 Episode 20
(it starts with three of them in the woods and getting into a rain shower)
Cowsinner
2016-04-30 18:54:08>> #101542
^_^
Sailor Moon.....lol
MisterMan4
2016-04-30 15:14:44>> #101533
Amentibus
2016-04-30 11:50:51>> #101517
Snootboop
2016-04-30 10:43:34>> #101512
Femiboy
2016-05-09 02:56:04>> #102923
AuburnHamster
2016-04-30 15:40:13>> #101534
FireMario86
2016-04-30 09:18:39>> #101508
Scrounge
2016-04-30 06:15:51>> #101491