I saw someone uploaded a coiling pic of Ms. Dani and I realized I never uploaded this to the hub. Whoops.....adaisy!! ^o^ Anyway yea, I did this a few months ago and I like how it turned out despite all the errors I am able to point out now. I'm working on more pics like this for the near future when life gets less busy.
Yeah, it's not outright bad, but the text is very clunky. You stumble over your own words a lot for sentences that really don't roll off the tongue at all. It feels like some sort of fanfic symptom.
The idea of the hypnotic hair is great. And is that your work on the glow? Because that looks pretty nice as well. But, yeah, as for the caption, practice your writing a little bit more, and it'll work out.
No worries. I doubt I'll try writing again any time soon, but if I do I'll keep that in mind.
I think the only other time I attempted a story someone took the image and rewrote it to fix my errors, so if anyone feels inclined again then go for it. I'll probably only post images once in a blue moon and will refrain from writing ever again.
Date Nov 30, 2016UserDantusRating ExplicitScore29(vote up)
Huh, didn't realize those two tags were separate - come to think of it, this is the first time in a while after blacklisting "furry" (no offense to people into that stuff, but it feels like the amount of furry to non-furry content is 5:1, and very little of it appeals to me) that I've seen anything involving animals, which I think means a lot of things with animals - whether it's "animals_only" or not - is getting tagged improperly as "furry". That or no tag exists specifically for animals in the image but not necessarily animals only.
On a more image related note: is it a Salandit or Salazzle? Because a Salandit wouldn't be that much larger than a Litten.
akaece said: This is unfortunately the case. It was a bad decision by the mods, I think, given that none of the mods like(d) furry stuff (at the time) or understand what appeals to who outside of humans, but that's the way it's used.
Umm... I'm pretty sure I was a mod at the time. And I was in full support of that tag specifically BECAUSE I was okay with furry (as in anthros), but was not a fan of all-fours, normal animals.
plsignore said: Then blacklist animals_only as well, then, god. The <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=animals_only | wiki>> is pretty clear that the two tags are more or less mutually exclusive
This is unfortunately the case. It was a bad decision by the mods, I think, given that none of the mods like(d) furry stuff (at the time) or understand what appeals to who outside of humans, but that's the way it's used.
WhatIsLove said: That's still furry. Tag it properly please. I don't want to see this crap.
Then blacklist animals_only as well, then, god. The <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=animals_only | wiki>> is pretty clear that the two tags are more or less mutually exclusive
crazyman
2016-12-01 00:53:46>> #141079
"Fantasius Bimbocus Slumberus"
:/
You'd think they would've seen it coming...
your avatar makes this so much better
Schralf
2016-12-01 00:11:28>> #141067
:/
You'd think they would've seen it coming...
Dumbboi
2016-12-02 18:11:42>> #141383
NOWHERE IS SACRED--
ShadowCalAgain
2016-12-01 23:29:04>> #141279
Alright, I can see that I will have to teach you how to be hypnotists!
Someone make a mashup of "We are Number One" and "Trust in Me" and we have the rest of this reenactment.
Sleepyhead97
2016-12-01 21:46:42>> #141262
*head shaking sound*
Alright, I can see that I will have to teach you how to be hypnotists!
AshleighZenith
2016-12-01 21:15:30>> #141258
Have you ever tried a pocketwatch?
*head shaking sound*
ShadowCalAgain
2016-12-01 19:43:18>> #141247
Nah, nah.
Have you ever tried a pocketwatch?
Kracky
2016-11-30 22:24:57>> #141045
Enjoy!
BillCiphersPuppet
2016-11-30 21:00:33>> #141037
SilverAlt
2016-12-01 04:24:03>> #141126
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPW3xzs0i0o
the video ;D
Love these. Any plans on robot-themed hypnosis?
mech1359
2016-12-01 03:57:51>> #141116
Evilunicorn
2016-11-30 20:38:55>> #141034
pony2
2016-11-30 19:41:34>> #141021
the video ;D
iWillObey
2019-07-13 14:40:57>> #326675
Keep going, and more text manips pls
Livejoebob123
2017-10-23 08:19:02>> #206704
Taryh
2016-12-01 23:19:08>> #141278
The idea of the hypnotic hair is great. And is that your work on the glow? Because that looks pretty nice as well.
But, yeah, as for the caption, practice your writing a little bit more, and it'll work out.
Ogodei-Khan
2016-12-01 01:25:32>> #141088
bellchan
2016-11-30 23:14:52>> #141053
Still WAY to purple to sound natural.
No worries. I doubt I'll try writing again any time soon, but if I do I'll keep that in mind.
I think the only other time I attempted a story someone took the image and rewrote it to fix my errors, so if anyone feels inclined again then go for it. I'll probably only post images once in a blue moon and will refrain from writing ever again.
Pinkanator
2016-11-30 17:10:37>> #141004
Pinkanator
2016-11-30 16:50:47>> #140996
cptnmxwll
2017-10-08 23:30:35>> #203314
Salazzle's hot and all but my eyes can't help keep looking at the damn realistic frog penis! Come on damn it!
Where is it?
mariosonicfan
2016-11-30 17:48:24>> #141010
Pinkanator
2016-11-30 16:56:23>> #141001
Hypnogaldaphne
2016-11-30 16:04:43>> #140985
VivianK
2016-12-02 07:11:46>> #141329
On a more image related note: is it a Salandit or Salazzle? Because a Salandit wouldn't be that much larger than a Litten.
Dantus
2016-12-01 16:21:31>> #141225
Mindwipe
2016-12-01 02:05:22>> #141095
This is unfortunately the case. It was a bad decision by the mods, I think, given that none of the mods like(d) furry stuff (at the time) or understand what appeals to who outside of humans, but that's the way it's used.
Umm... I'm pretty sure I was a mod at the time. And I was in full support of that tag specifically BECAUSE I was okay with furry (as in anthros), but was not a fan of all-fours, normal animals.
akaece
2016-12-01 02:02:38>> #141094
Then blacklist animals_only as well, then, god. The <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=animals_only | wiki>> is pretty clear that the two tags are more or less mutually exclusive
This is unfortunately the case. It was a bad decision by the mods, I think, given that none of the mods like(d) furry stuff (at the time) or understand what appeals to who outside of humans, but that's the way it's used.
plsignore
2016-12-01 01:01:55>> #141082
That's still furry. Tag it properly please. I don't want to see this crap.
Then blacklist animals_only as well, then, god. The <<hypnohub.net/wiki/show?title=animals_only | wiki>> is pretty clear that the two tags are more or less mutually exclusive