Posted on 2013-10-08 06:26:19
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Quality check?

Posted on 2013-10-08 08:32:29
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Spoke to Mindwipe about it. Personally, I'm on the fence. There are some errors here and there that stand out to me, and there's no real shading, yet at the same time it's not all too terrible when looked at like it's supposed to be all cartoon-y. Mindwipe, on the other hand, says it makes the cut, if not just barely.

Posted on 2013-10-08 10:07:17
Score: 0 (vote Up)

What are the errors you're noticing? Only thing (other than the shading) that pops out for me is the odd shape of their leg muscles.

Posted on 2013-10-11 09:29:21
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Arms, too. But really, that's about it. Those three things. None of the errors were really all that bad, though, which is why the image was above the required level of quality.

Posted on 2013-10-11 16:12:36
Score: 0 (vote Up)

The arms/legs just seem like a unique style to me, but them hands/feet..

Posted on 2013-10-11 19:31:31
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Well, actually, I was clumping hands and feet together with arms and legs. Thus where the problems I mentioned lie.

Posted on 2013-10-12 00:39:16
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Seems good enough for me. I've seen worse pics on here.

Posted on 2013-10-12 00:53:47
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Ouch.

Posted on 2013-10-12 04:32:28
Score: 0 (vote Up)

I've always liked this picture :(

Posted on 2013-10-12 08:05:05
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Subjectivity makes everything confusing.