I have a genuine question related to the content of this entire pool... Is this content actually allowed on the site? Didn't the site's host make a rule against explicit shota/loli content regardless of realism? Did that rule change at some point or did the mods deem this an exception to the rule? To be clear I have nothing against this pool, I'm just confused as to whether the rules have changed or not.
No-Ω said: I have a genuine question related to the content of this entire pool... Is this content actually allowed on the site? Didn't the site's host make a rule against explicit shota/loli content regardless of realism? Did that rule change at some point or did the mods deem this an exception to the rule? To be clear I have nothing against this pool, I'm just confused as to whether the rules have changed or not.
Due to staff having irl stuff to deal with, there will tend to be content that hasn’t been fully reviewed, as we try to judge everything on a case by case basis. It’s not that this one’s an exception, it just hasn’t been brought up until now.
>> #388412
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #388429
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Motherly needing *drools*
>> #397132
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #397133
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I have a genuine question related to the content of this entire pool... Is this content actually allowed on the site? Didn't the site's host make a rule against explicit shota/loli content regardless of realism? Did that rule change at some point or did the mods deem this an exception to the rule? To be clear I have nothing against this pool, I'm just confused as to whether the rules have changed or not.
Due to staff having irl stuff to deal with, there will tend to be content that hasn’t been fully reviewed, as we try to judge everything on a case by case basis. It’s not that this one’s an exception, it just hasn’t been brought up until now.