Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? cang se ye hua 2
- ? jjmayoboy (manipper) 113
General
- ? bondage 6959
- ? breasts 104748
- ? collar 13779
- ? confused 2545
- ? consensual 1445
- ? exhibitionism 1459
- ? female only 57749
- ? femsub 133682
- ? humor 2876
- ? leash 1939
- ? nipple piercing 2588
- ? piercing 3849
- ? pov 8658
- ? rope 674
- ? shibari 179
- ? urination 1198
Meta
- ? caption 8944
- ? manip 16683
- ? tagme 6119
- ? text 83771
Statistics
- Id: 110959
-
Posted: 2021-02-06 23:39:05
by JJMayoBoy - Size: 1920x959
- Source: rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3983985
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 247 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #405374
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This post is a reupload, the original had some grammar errors and I forgot to color in the text. RIP post 110925
>> #405391
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Never seen it used for hypnosis, though
>> #405418
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405452
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405455
Score: 0 (vote Up)
TAG YOUR FUCKING PISS FETISH!
Is a pair of mentions of it in reference to a previous in-universe incident that is not the focus of the manip really something that warrants the urination tag? It's barely a feature of the text, much less the pic.
>> #405456
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405471
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #405475
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Is a pair of mentions of it in reference to a previous in-universe incident that is not the focus of the manip really something that warrants the urination tag? It's barely a feature of the text, much less the pic.
Yes. Yes it fucking is. The manip includes it, so it needs to be tagged. Because people who block those tags do so for a reason.
>> #405479
Score: 0 (vote Up)
TAG YOUR FUCKING PISS FETISH!
Hey sorry bro. I was more or less just trying to make a reason why she would bring extra clothes with her and that was the first thing that came to mind. I thought that just sort of mentioning it briefly wouldn’t be enough to warrant a tag but I probably just should’ve been safe. I was also just a bit worried people would be mad at me for including it in a post that doesn’t actively have any urination. Thanks for calling me out, I’ll be sure to make sure anything potentially disturbing like that is tagged for safety in future posts, and sorry if it disturbed you that wasn’t never my intention.
>> #405483
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hey sorry bro. I was more or less just trying to make a reason why she would bring extra clothes with her and that was the first thing that came to mind. I thought that just sort of mentioning it briefly wouldn’t be enough to warrant a tag but I probably just should’ve been safe. I was also just a bit worried people would be mad at me for including it in a post that doesn’t actively have any urination. Thanks for calling me out, I’ll be sure to make sure anything potentially disturbing like that is tagged for safety in future posts, and sorry if it disturbed you that wasn’t never my intention.
Hey, thanks man. Sorry for coming off so intense. It's always better to over tag than under, though.