Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? looney tunes 59
- ? space jam 29
Character
- ? lola bunny 41
Artist
- ? anonymind (manipper) 338
- ? zero-sum 1
General
- ? bottomless 40977
- ? breasts 103903
- ? bunny girl 2550
- ? empty eyes 36403
- ? femsub 132796
- ? furry 17909
- ? humor 2859
- ? large breasts 58421
- ? mantra 1787
- ? nude 38809
- ? small breasts 4737
- ? topless 44743
Meta
- ? absurdres 34599
- ? comic 28116
- ? dialogue 23021
- ? manip 16652
- ? text 83146
Statistics
- Id: 122277
-
Posted: 2021-07-22 05:02:19
by anonymind - Size: 3498x2816
- Source: www.newgrounds.com/art/view/foxinshadow/pick-your-bun
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 140 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #429761
Score: 1 (vote Up)
>> #429768
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Just me having fun with a recent dumb fandom controversy.
What’s the controversy? I haven’t been paying attention to the fandom
>> #429770
Score: 0 (vote Up)
What’s the controversy? I haven’t been paying attention to the fandom
Some people claimed that Lola has much smaller boobs in the new movie than she did in the original Space Jam. Which is dumb because she didn't exactly have huge boobs in the original either. Those people are clearly confusing fan art Lola for the Lola in the actual movie. Still, there was cries of censorship and trying to appease soccer moms/sjws and not staying true to the original "vision" and blah blah blah...
>> #429775
Score: 0 (vote Up)
in any case this is a funny little pic and it amuses me.
>> #429779
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Some people claimed that Lola has much smaller boobs in the new movie than she did in the original Space Jam. Which is dumb because she didn't exactly have huge boobs in the original either. Those people are clearly confusing fan art Lola for the Lola in the actual movie. Still, there was cries of censorship and trying to appease soccer moms/sjws and not staying true to the original "vision" and blah blah blah...
Well that does sound like something they would do. But yeah that’s definitely not the case. Lola was always like that. She was made to show a strong female character that wasn’t just eye candy.
>> #429781
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Well that does sound like something they would do. But yeah that’s definitely not the case. Lola was always like that. She was made to show a strong female character that wasn’t just eye candy.
Which, to be honest, they failed at, because Lola literally exists to be hit on in the original movie and barely says even 2 lines.
>> #429782
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Which is dumb because she didn't exactly have huge boobs in the original either.
Yes, but compare them side by side and you will see that a shrink did in fact occur.
I'm neutral on the subject, but we should at least make sure the discussion is based on reality.
>> #429805
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #429830
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Which, to be honest, they failed at, because Lola literally exists to be hit on in the original movie and barely says even 2 lines.
True. But it always felt like the being hit on was for a statement. So there would be a reason for her to get all annoyed and “don’t call me doll”. Show the problem so you can show the solution kinda thing. But I will be fair and recognize that it could easily be see as her just being eye candy.
>> #429840
Score: 0 (vote Up)
True. But it always felt like the being hit on was for a statement. So there would be a reason for her to get all annoyed and “don’t call me doll”. Show the problem so you can show the solution kinda thing.
Yeah, but when that's the only reason she exists, it feels less "showing the problem" and more perpetuating the problem.
I feel like I'm bringing the previously stated fandom drama here, and I apologize for that.