Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 43320
Artist
- ? luckyluckyluckypenny 201
General
- ? androgynous 2023
- ? blush 37067
- ? crossdressing 1352
- ? dazed 12685
- ? diaper 1541
- ? drool 25418
- ? feminization 1459
- ? fishnets 2310
- ? happy trance 46944
- ? long hair 58453
- ? malesub 14062
- ? poofy diaper 76
- ? spiral eyes 23973
- ? symbol in eyes 32495
- ? tongue 19282
- ? tongue out 18497
- ? transformation 9670
- ? transgender 1943
Meta
- ? greyscale 10457
- ? monochrome 7659
- ? text 83768
- ? western 9320
Statistics
- Id: 12370
-
Posted: 2014-02-18 06:33:44
by buckethazard - Size: 1800x2200
- Source: luckyluckyluckypenny.devi...rt/Sissy-Teapot-431164753
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 63 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #10600
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10601
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10602
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10604
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10606
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I would think it works for girls...it would mean making them all submissive and stuff, just like it does guys.
If that were all being a sissy was, every pic would have that tag.
Edit: The dA page refers to the character as "her", which may not mean anything given the nature of the pic, but I'd say this should be tagged femsub.
>> #10608
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hmm, something there's I've always been uncertain about. Is sissification something only limited to boys or can it happen to girls too? I'm only asking now because this one has breasts.
Keep in mind the artist here.
Edit: The dA page refers to the character as "her", which may not mean anything given the nature of the pic, but I'd say this should be tagged femsub.
Hhhhehehe. Go through his gallery and reconsider. I'd just leave it untagged as far as that goes since it's waaaaaaaay questionable either way, though when he was drawing it I want to say he was probably thinking male. I do think an ambiguous_gender tag like e621 has would be a good idea.
>> #10609
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10610
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #10611
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I don't see how females can be sissies. I thought the whole point of sissies were that they were feminized guys. That's what we have the tag defined as.
I sort of wish the world were progressive enough for sissification to apply to both genders... huh... I'm odd.
Keep in mind the artist here.
Not sure what this means.
>> #10613
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I know luckyluckyluckypenny does some transformation sissy stuff (see post 9943). Maybe this is more of that?
That would be my guess.
Not sure what this means.
Have you seen his gallery?