absurdres blonde_hair comic dialogue femdom sailor_moon sailor_moon_(series) text wadevezecha

7 comments (0 hidden)

Lumitiel
>> #457523
Posted on 2022-02-07 03:56:06
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hello again! Just in case you missed it any of the previous times I mentioned, I have a Patreon where I put art that I've commissioned as well as early peeks at writing I've done. If you want to see the full script for this ten page comic, or the next page a month early, please go there and consider contributing. The more that's brought in, the more that can get commissioned.

www.patreon.com/user?u=3811771

Okay, shilling done, I *adored* this idea on first thinking of it about half a year ago, using the transformation as a hypnosis vector feels like a pretty good original idea. Right?

Bloodly
>> #457530
Posted on 2022-02-07 05:08:34
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Answering Usagi's question.

In short: Blame America.

Long: Because there's strict laws about depicting certain things, made after the surrender at World War 2, and they're obeying the letter and not the spirit.("It's a tentacle! A TENTACLE! Not...that!" See also; tiny censorship bars and blurring only certain parts while showing everything else.) This shouldn't have surprised anyone given 'The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife', but there you go. Of course, the thought of being gripped from all sides and pleasured from all angles had an appeal of it's own.

Posted on 2022-02-07 06:00:13
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Please remember to tag the artist.

AnonymousBrainwash
>> #457558
Posted on 2022-02-07 08:46:28
Score: 1 (vote Up)
Bloodly said:
Answering Usagi's question.

In short: Blame America.

Long: Because there's strict laws about depicting certain things, made after the surrender at World War 2, and they're obeying the letter and not the spirit.("It's a tentacle! A TENTACLE! Not...that!" See also; tiny censorship bars and blurring only certain parts while showing everything else.) This shouldn't have surprised anyone given 'The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife', but there you go. Of course, the thought of being gripped from all sides and pleasured from all angles had an appeal of it's own.


Wait wait wait…you’re telling me that the reason Japan is seen as the tentacle porn king…is because we (the USA) forbid them from making regular porn? *stutters in disbelief* WHY?! Like what law maker was like “yes we need to stifle Japan’s native adult entertainment industry” If it was live I could maybe get health and safety concerns (maybe) but a good chunk of Japan’s porn industry is animated or drawn (to my knowledge). And then we just blame them for being kinky mother fuckers when we are the ones responsible for it? WTF USA?

DarthVader1321
>> #457561
Posted on 2022-02-07 08:58:43
Score: 1 (vote Up)
AnonymousBrainwash said:
Wait wait wait…you’re telling me that the reason Japan is seen as the tentacle porn king…is because we (the USA) forbid them from making regular porn? *stutters in disbelief* WHY?! Like what law maker was like “yes we need to stifle Japan’s native adult entertainment industry” If it was live I could maybe get health and safety concerns (maybe) but a good chunk of Japan’s porn industry is animated or drawn (to my knowledge). And then we just blame them for being kinky mother fuckers when we are the ones responsible for it? WTF USA?


The USA is just kind of weird like that. I’ve honestly given up trying to understand them.

coredumperror
>> #457563
Posted on 2022-02-07 09:30:49
Score: 1 (vote Up)
AnonymousBrainwash said:
WHY?! Like what law maker was like “yes we need to stifle Japan’s native adult entertainment industry”?


It's a hyper-specific censorship law, likely forced through by the Christian missionaries who were proselytizing in the country while America was in charge. They're not allowed to depict public hair or genitals in any media. So if you want to draw sex, you have to either censor it (usually with mosaics for video and black bars for illustrations), or draw something that's NOT genitals or public hair.

Thus, the birth of tentacle porn, which aren't genitals, and have no public hair.

ChakatFirepaw
>> #458293
Posted on 2022-02-13 00:20:42
Score: 1 (vote Up)
coredumperror said:
It's a hyper-specific censorship law, likely forced through by the Christian missionaries who were proselytizing in the country while America was in charge. They're not allowed to depict public hair or genitals in any media. So if you want to draw sex, you have to either censor it (usually with mosaics for video and black bars for illustrations), or draw something that's NOT genitals or public hair.

Thus, the birth of tentacle porn, which aren't genitals, and have no public hair.


The thing about the US, (often specifically credited to MacArthur), forcing censorship on Japanese artists and this leading to the obsession with tentacles is a myth: The censorship law predates the US occupation, (it's interwar), and the Japanese thing for tentacle porn has examples literally going back centuries.

1