Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? original 43072
Artist
- ? immelmann 157
General
- ? ball gag 789
- ? bondage 6936
- ? boots 5811
- ? bottomless 40931
- ? breasts 103817
- ? cat girl 4031
- ? choker 4844
- ? dollification 1109
- ? empty eyes 36385
- ? erect nipples 16602
- ? femsub 132654
- ? furry 17903
- ? gag 1325
- ? gloves 14648
- ? harness 448
- ? long hair 58154
- ? mirror 395
- ? nipples 16311
- ? opera gloves 7867
- ? pet play 4747
- ? pink eyes 8292
- ? pink hair 10461
- ? pony play 67
- ? saddle 16
- ? thigh boots 2954
- ? tiger girl 248
Meta
- ? absurdres 34581
Statistics
- Id: 18169
-
Posted: 2014-07-20 10:11:17
by greasyi - Size: 3150x2400
- Source: xxx.immelmann.net/carousel-tiger/
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 73 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #23278
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23279
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23280
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23282
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This is personally of my all time favorites. No sissy or gay themes, no guro, just beauty.
>> #23285
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23338
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23344
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23345
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Does the "Human" Pet tag really apply here?
The definition of the tag is as follows:
Sounds good enough to me. There's really no reason to have a furry-only version of the tag so if this is an issue we'd just change the tag name; however everyone on the site, including the furries, are pretty used to this by now, since the first human_pet tag was added to a furry pic since before the site moved here.