Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? wildfire (manipper) 20
General
- ? black hair 30415
- ? blonde hair 33312
- ? blush 36835
- ? breasts 103850
- ? brown eyes 6647
- ? cleavage 23005
- ? closed eyes 2043
- ? drool 25173
- ? femsub 132687
- ? french kiss 661
- ? group sex 1299
- ? incest 1347
- ? kissing 3135
- ? large breasts 58412
- ? long hair 58165
- ? maledom 35613
- ? multiple girls 15642
- ? sex 17805
- ? short hair 41053
- ? sisters 768
- ? smile 28755
- ? threesome 796
- ? vaginal 11195
Meta
- ? caption 8921
- ? caption only 2824
- ? manip 16651
- ? text 83027
>> #23332
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23334
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23426
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #23474
Score: 0 (vote Up)
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...
I tried to come up with a witty explanation, but drew a blank. You're right, aside from "it's a law in Japan", there really is no logic behind it, huh? Can't be "protecting" the children. I mean, if it is an attempt to do so, than it fails before it begins, because this is porn. It seems to be "just because our society deems it unacceptable to have showing". Because, you know, censored porn is obviously used for far less nefarious purposes than uncensored porn.
>> #70539
Score: 0 (vote Up)
i really don't get censoring like what do they think that we think is underneath it is it a phone?, or a newspaper? or...
Its for suspension of disbelief. So they can say "well its not 100% that..."