Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? sailor moon (series) 1330
Character
- ? sailor mercury 534
Artist
- ? arioncanvas 1
- ? vanndril (manipper) 192
General
- ? blue eyes 17203
- ? blue hair 13137
- ? blush 36679
- ? bottomless 40801
- ? breasts 103296
- ? chains 1218
- ? collar 13633
- ? dog pose 1054
- ? earrings 8924
- ? empty eyes 36252
- ? exhibitionism 1427
- ? femsub 131941
- ? happy trance 46611
- ? jewelry 9645
- ? large breasts 58291
- ? leash 1914
- ? nipples 16085
- ? nude 38523
- ? open clothes 5889
- ? pet play 4741
- ? short hair 40964
- ? squatting 3006
- ? tongue 19031
- ? tongue out 18283
- ? topless 44506
Meta
- ? manip 16633
Statistics
- Id: 18425
-
Posted: 2014-08-04 08:32:04
by Vanndril - Size: 1024x768
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...um&illust_id=45048156
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 145 (vote up)
>> #24440
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Those eyes were harder to manip than they looked...
>> #24451
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24454
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait what happened to the original O_O
RIP
Rest In Pixiv
>> #24456
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Wait what happened to the original O_O
It wasn't (turtley) MC enough for the (turtle) MC club.
>> #24473
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It wasn't (turtley) MC enough for the (turtle) MC club.
Really, I thought it fit right in. True she still had light in her eyes, but she was still acting like a dog while also being nude. somethings Ami is never really known to do.
>> #24476
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Really, I thought it fit right in. True she still had light in her eyes, but she was still acting like a dog while also being nude. somethings Ami is never really known to do.
the problem with that is, most known characters don't have sex either; would you think it was MC if she was kissing another girl, or wearing punk clothes? Porn makes 'what a character would do' unreliable
I still feel the original had MC elements, tho
>> #24488
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Porn makes 'what a character would do' unreliable
This. In hentai, even the strictest and straightest of characters become horny bisexual mega-sluts who are into really kinky things without even an ounce of MC. You really just can't go by that.
I still feel the original had MC elements, tho
Possibly. I wouldn't have it in my MC folders, personally, and I'm usually fairly lax about the requirements of an image being considered MC, as I have images there that aren't MC enough for the site because they look or feel MC to me. The potential MC elements of the original image were all far too subtle. It would be very hard to defend disallowing almost any image if that one were to have stayed in its unmanipped form.
In any case, unless you loved the eyes in the original (which I wouldn't blame you if you do, as they were gorgeously done), you all lost nothing in having me manip it to keep it up. I think it was a good solution. :P
>> #24495
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24498
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I didn't know you could remove one pic and put in another in its place, tags and score transferred to the new
You can. In fact, anybody (who can delete an image - say, the uploader) can, it's not just the admins. ;)
You just need to make the NEW pic the parent of the OLD pic. Then, when you delete the OLD pic, the parent (new) pic will receive everything that is transferred.
>> #24527
Score: 0 (vote Up)
You can. In fact, anybody (who can delete an image - say, the uploader) can, it's not just the admins. ;)
You just need to make the NEW pic the parent of the OLD pic. Then, when you delete the OLD pic, the parent (new) pic will receive everything that is transferred.
Niiiice
& manipulating the eyes was a good solution to both cutting off the pointless argument & keeping the picture, but a part of me is frustrated with the dichotomous standard & bureaucratic thinking it represents