Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? one piece 769
Character
- ? nami (one piece) 335
Artist
- ? jimryu 1296
General
- ? barefoot 11994
- ? bikini 5019
- ? breasts 103612
- ? empty eyes 36297
- ? expressionless 20400
- ? female only 57041
- ? femsub 132271
- ? long hair 58077
- ? nipples 16170
- ? orange hair 5830
- ? red eyes 9448
- ? red hair 15649
- ? solo 20859
- ? standing 12470
- ? standing at attention 5702
- ? topless 44590
Meta
- ? dead source 842
- ? simple background 10854
- ? transparent background 244
Statistics
- Id: 18518
-
Posted: 2014-08-09 00:14:41
by HypnoHammer - Size: 591x1350
- Source: jimryu.deviantart.com/art/Nami-hypnotized-474149820
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 94 (vote up)
>> #24851
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24852
Score: 0 (vote Up)
another pic from the jimryu
Fixed ; )
>> #24853
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Also, even though I don't like One Piece, I do like how Oda handled Nami's design post-time skip. Probably one of the things I like about the series that I can count on two hands.
>> #24859
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Also, even though I don't like One Piece, I do like how Oda handled Nami's design post-time skip. Probably one of the things I like about the series that I can count on two hands.
Really? I hated it. The long hair makes her a lot more generic (same goes for Robin) and her design less interesting. Additionally, while I like her jeans, the effect is nullified by her apparent bikini top dress code. T-shirts or long-sleeved shirts would have made the design cooler and less gratuitously fanservicey in a series that until recently mostly stayed away from such things (I REALLY hate the spike in fanservice One Piece has had in recent years. Combined with the way Oda frequently struggles to write women well, it makes the series much more sexist in general).
All that said, not a bad pic.
>> #24865
Score: 0 (vote Up)
This pic i don't find particularly alluring due to the lack of empty eyes, but 2Y Nami is the shit and all of hentai-dom needs more of her.
>> #24879
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #24881
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I especially love the amount of detail he put in to her tattoo.
you mean not including it at all?
>> #24943
Score: 0 (vote Up)
you mean not including it at all?
thatsthejoke.gif
>> #24953
Score: 0 (vote Up)
thatsthejoke.gif
it's impossible to tell that on here
>> #24970
Score: 0 (vote Up)
it's impossible to tell that on here
Then you have no reading comprehension. If I say "I love the amount of detail he put into the tattoo" and there is no tattoo, then I am saying "I love that he put no effort into the tattoo" which basically equates to: "lol Jimryu. Way to keep failing, buddy."
There's really no other way to read it. The only other assumption you can make from my post is that I somehow DO see the non-existent tattoo. I cannot even comprehend a third way of reading my comment.