Posted on 2023-11-26 05:39:07
Score: 6 (vote Up)

Day 23: Class

Posted on 2023-11-26 06:44:20
Score: 7 (vote Up)

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES train the new geneartion properly this shouldb have happened in azure

Posted on 2023-11-26 10:19:35
Score: 3 (vote Up)

I hate myself for being the guy to ask, but how is this not explicit loli? Even if we're not seeing naughty bits, last I checked depictions of masturbation counted as explicit.

Posted on 2023-11-26 23:19:40
Score: 1 (vote Up)

@TheKinkyFinn
So, is just adding the tag enough or are we looking to remove the image?

I still don't quite get where the Hub stands on loli. There are loli images on the site and some of them are explicit in their own right.

Posted on 2023-11-26 23:41:38
Score: 1 (vote Up)

I don't know much if anything on Trails so if someone is familiar with it.

Though it is fully clothed touching/not seeing it and Loli = bodytype.

Posted on 2023-11-27 00:57:25
Score: 1 (vote Up)

@LillyTank
On principle, I think under the current rules this shouldn't stay. I want to be wrong, but if that's the rules, then I believe they should be followed. The mods, to their credit, are being quite lax on the topic as is, and the tag definition describes loli/shota as "prepubescent", hence why characters with even a slight bust tend to get a pass. Overall I appreciate that since I've seen little to no moralizing from on high on the topic, it certainly helps sell that the rule change was due to external pressure alone.

Maybe it's just my knowledge of the IP tainting my view, but KeA is very much implied to be prepubescent in Zero/Azure, with other petite characters like Tio and Sully being noticeably taller than her. The clothes do make it hard to judge, but when even the aforementioned barely have anything going for them...

As for the rating: at least as I've understood it, overtly sexual acts are classified as explicit because of their nature, otherwise there's no real point to even mention them in the rating guidelines when it already covers visible genitalia. If masturbation or sex aren't explicit as long as we don't see the goods, I've some images I could reupload that I never once thought should stay after the rule change.

But maybe I'm wrong and this much is still acceptable on the Hub. Frankly, that'd be the best outcome, but I'm not known for my optimism.

Posted on 2023-11-27 01:22:36
Score: 3 (vote Up)

I mean, knowledge about the franchise means nothing since we have a lot of picture of pokemon characters that under the canon counts as loli. otherwise we would remove all the misty fanarts except the ones with the time skip design.

As long as the character doesn't looks like a loli I think it can stay.

If it is still problematic the other way to stay is making the same than the Tita picture, just change the tranparent table for a normal one.

Posted on 2023-11-27 05:16:10
Score: 0 (vote Up)

Quick question but who's the blue haired one?