age_regression blue_eyes blue_hair bottomless breasts clone dalo_knight diaper erect_nipples femsub ghost_in_the_shell large_breasts maledom micro_bikini motoko_kusanagi multiple_girls nipples nude purple_hair pussy red_eyes side-tie_panties small_breasts standing standing_at_attention tech_control text topless underwear urination

10 comments (0 hidden)

Ogodei-Khan
>> #26429
Posted on 2014-08-24 18:57:35
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ugh, of course diaper play.

Otherwise i like the concept here, especially with distinctly different Motokos involved. Bring in other styles, like the one from the Oshii films and one more directly adapted from Shirow's manga style.

JimLogan54
>> #26473
Posted on 2014-08-25 07:00:35
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ogodei-Khan said:
ugh, of course diaper play.

Otherwise i like the concept here, especially with distinctly different Motokos involved. Bring in other styles, like the one from the Oshii films and one more directly adapted from Shirow's manga style.


What's wrong with diaper play?

kirux
>> #26478
Posted on 2014-08-25 07:59:42
Score: 0 (vote Up)
JimLogan54 said:
What's wrong with diaper play?

Everyone not having the same fetish. Add to that someone else's fetish can be a turn off for you. Then an entire set can be rendered useless by the presence of that one thing. Nothing "wrong" with a diaper fetish, but if someone was enjoying the set up until this point. It's like right before hitting climax someone punches you in the balls.

JimLogan54
>> #26479
Posted on 2014-08-25 08:03:57
Score: 0 (vote Up)
kirux said:
Everyone not having the same fetish. Add to that someone else's fetish can be a turn off for you. Then an entire set can be rendered useless by the presence of that one thing. Nothing "wrong" with a diaper fetish, but if someone was enjoying the set up until this point. It's like right before hitting climax someone punches you in the balls.


Oh, I see. Thanks for the explanation

Grim
>> #26485
Posted on 2014-08-25 09:54:46
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ogodei-Khan said:
ugh, of course diaper play.

Otherwise i like the concept here,


at least the diaper stuff is kept to small tidy bit, not some sort of horrendous overflowing scat pic - it can mostly be ignored

personally, if its framed right, I can enjoy a bit of the various gross biologicals, as long as it just represents either a complete loss of personal control, or highlights the degree of control the master has, and is merely a footnote in the story or picture, not the key feature


urahara64360
>> #32249
Posted on 2014-10-14 07:34:36
Score: 0 (vote Up)
i actually am kind of ashamed i am overthinking porn, i am trying to figure out which is the actual Major. if none of them are and they are simply android replicants that would make since but if they are who would build a robot with a bladder. the Major wouldn't have one either since she is a full body prosthetic, like i said i am overthinking it

disgustinggirl
>> #32274
Posted on 2014-10-14 11:25:48
Score: 0 (vote Up)
kirux said:
Everyone not having the same fetish.


Nothing wrong with that. At all.

Add to that someone else's fetish can be a turn off for you. Then an entire set can be rendered useless by the presence of that one thing. Nothing "wrong" with a diaper fetish, but if someone was enjoying the set up until this point. It's like right before hitting climax someone punches you in the balls.


Ugh. You're making it sound like there would be some sort of obligation for artists to only create material that's fappable to all, because otherwise they're committing a horrible act of violence (read: ball-punching) on those who are turned off by one thing or another.

Vanndril
>> #32275
Posted on 2014-10-14 11:30:50
Score: 0 (vote Up)
disgustinggirl said:
Ugh. You're making it sound like there would be some sort of obligation for artists to only create material that's fappable to all, because otherwise they're committing a horrible act of violence (read: ball-punching) on those who are turned off by one thing or another.


As an extremely open-minded individual, I actually think of it this way: it's the viewers fault for not liking the fetish.

disgustinggirl
>> #32277
Posted on 2014-10-14 12:13:02
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Vanndril said:
As an extremely open-minded individual, I actually think of it this way: it's the viewers fault for not liking the fetish.


I wouldn't say anyone is at "fault" neither for creating niche fetish material, nor for disliking it. But some of the complaints convey a certain sense of entitlement and that I don't care for.

Vanndril
>> #32450
Posted on 2014-10-16 08:57:49
Score: 0 (vote Up)
disgustinggirl said:
I wouldn't say anyone is at "fault" neither for creating niche fetish material, nor for disliking it.


Well, I didn't meant fault with any sort of negative connotation, but simply that the cause of the effect lies with them, not the one who made the content. But this is the sort of conversation that only managed to confuse people, so I'll shut up now. :P

disgustinggirl said:
But some of the complaints convey a certain sense of entitlement and that I don't care for.


I agree, personally. I feel that way whenever someone complains about free stuff. Gift horse and mouth and all that.

1