Search

(Supports wildcard *)
Statistics
Options
History
Related Posts
animal_transformation blonde_hair bottomless breasts bunny_futa bunny_girl choker cunnilingus drool erect_nipples femsub fox_girl furry futanari futasub glasses glowing glowing_eyes huge_clit long_tongue magic multiple_girls nude open_mouth oral original pussy pussy_juice red_hair sillygirl_(sinner) sinner sitting spread_legs tongue tongue_out topless transformation transgender unhappy_trance

Edit | Respond

7 comments (0 hidden)

Mindwipe
>> #46726
Posted on 2015-02-19 03:36:50
Score: 0 (vote Up)
When did we get an animal_transformation tag, and why does its usage not really make sense?
Grim
>> #46736
Posted on 2015-02-19 04:34:20
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Mindwipe said:
When did we get an animal_transformation tag, and why does its usage not really make sense?


hmmm, it might be dual purpose: both for those made to think they are animals, which seems like a thing that should have a tag, and/or non directly mind control related to the physical transformation into an animal or furry, which of course may or may not also include mind control, but might be something people may want to find or avoid regardless
Mindwipe
>> #46738
Posted on 2015-02-19 04:44:05
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Grim said:
hmmm, it might be dual purpose: both for those made to think they are animals, which seems like a thing that should have a tag, and/or non directly mind control related to the physical transformation into an animal or furry, which of course may or may not also include mind control, but might be something people may want to find or avoid regardless


The first thing has a tag: human_pet. I've largely been up on new tags getting approved for use, but I don't remember ever seeing a discussion on "animal_transformation", and the fact that most of the pics with it don't seem to show people actually becoming animals makes me wonder if it was ever approved.
Vanndril
>> #46751
Posted on 2015-02-19 06:06:45
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Mindwipe said:
The first thing has a tag: human_pet. I've largely been up on new tags getting approved for use, but I don't remember ever seeing a discussion on "animal_transformation", and the fact that most of the pics with it don't seem to show people actually becoming animals makes me wonder if it was ever approved.


It wasn't.

Or, if it was, I have absolutely zero recollection as to why. o.O

I don't even see any rhyme or reason to its usage.
phantomreader42
>> #46770
Posted on 2015-02-19 07:27:59
Score: 0 (vote Up)
To me, human_pet implies a human (or humanoid) acting like a pet specifically (walking on a leash, doing tricks, begging for treats). Acting like an animal is not the same thing as acting like a pet.
greasyi
>> #46784
Posted on 2015-02-19 08:58:17
Score: 0 (vote Up)
human_pet does a lot of duty:
* What phantomreader42 said
* Also humans/kemonomimi acting like non-pet animals
* Also furries acting like non-furry animals, usually by wearing collars and getting on all fours

Basically it's any humanoid that's very clearly acting like an animal. "Very clearly" usually means that they're costumed and/or behaving like something humans have domesticated - also most petplay and furries are domesticated things or their close relatives anyway. No one's ever seriously tried to split the tag up because it can be so ambiguous. ("Yeah she's on all fours and growling but she thinks she's a wolf...")
Grim
>> #46795
Posted on 2015-02-19 10:18:38
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Mindwipe said:
and the fact that most of the pics with it don't seem to show people actually becoming animals


hmm, glancing at the pics with the tag, they sure seem to be gaining physical animal attributes, such as a minimum of ears, tails, or horns, if not say, a furry transforming into a completely different type of furry

.... of course, by the same token, tail, horns, and animal_ears are all tags, but they seem to indicate the presence of them, not their generation.... I'm not sure if that's something we care about or not
1