Search
(Supports wildcard *)Artist
- ? immelmann 157
- ? suddenlytsumi (colorist) 11
General
- ? bat boy 54
- ? black hair 30241
- ? bottomless 40902
- ? clothed exposure 4264
- ? evil smile 3484
- ? furry 17888
- ? glowing 15771
- ? glowing eyes 16733
- ? harness 448
- ? large balls 150
- ? large penis 975
- ? latex 6539
- ? looking at viewer 12602
- ? male only 6706
- ? maledom 35472
- ? masturbation 5324
- ? nude 38652
- ? penis 26762
- ? pov 8609
- ? pov sub 5011
- ? purple eyes 6714
- ? short hair 41006
- ? smile 28712
- ? solo 20938
- ? topless 44612
- ? wings 3597
Meta
- ? absurdres 34532
- ? text 82579
Statistics
- Id: 36752
-
Posted: 2016-05-19 08:37:53
by greasyi - Size: 2395x3148
- Source: xxx.immelmann.net/warm-gaze-across-a-crowded-room/
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 48 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #104803
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #104806
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #104813
Score: 0 (vote Up)
My bad, I honestly try to but I often forget because it's a weird tag that serves no purpose and yes this comment is unnecessarily inflammatory but it seriously doesn't
It serves the purpose of letting me never see pics of dudes jerking it, like this.
>> #104820
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It serves the purpose of letting me never see pics of dudes jerking it, like this.
It actually doesn't. If there's a woman in the picture while a male is jerking it, you're still at risk.
>> #104823
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It actually doesn't. If there's a woman in the picture while a male is jerking it, you're still at risk.
I meant when there's nothing else in the image.
>> #104836
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It actually doesn't. If there's a woman in the picture while a male is jerking it, you're still at risk.
At least there's a woman to distract from the male jerking it in that case.
>> #104936
Score: 0 (vote Up)
And if that seems like a lot of tags, you're wrong; setting up blacklists should be the hard part about using this site, not tagging images, since the latter happens way more often.
>> #104945
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I made sure to tag with maledom and penis so that blacklists could capture that stuff so depending on what you hate you can totally blacklist anything I can think of without the male_only tag. blacklisting male_only is basically blacklisting male* -fem* -futa*. If all you want to avoid is dudes jerking it with nothing else in the image you can blacklist masturbation -fem* -futa* .
And if that seems like a lot of tags, you're wrong; setting up blacklists should be the hard part about using this site, not tagging images, since the latter happens way more often.
We don't have male or female tags. And blacklisting maledom penis would hide a significant number of pics with girls. Long story short, it's easier this way, just use the tag.
>> #104949
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Also? No, blacklisting should NOT be the hard part. If people do not want to see something, it should be relatively easy for them to set up their blacklists so they don't have to see it. It is far more reasonable to expect the person posting to cover any sensitive tags than it is for every user to assume the tags they are sensitive to may be forgotten about and to write 400 contingency tag combinations to avoid seeing it.
Mistakes happen, of course, and some users may forget from time to time, but when you are told that someone is sensitive to a tag, it's far better to just try to remember to include the tag, not argue that you don't want to be bothered with it.
>> #104954
Score: 0 (vote Up)
We don't have male or female tags. And blacklisting maledom penis would hide a significant number of pics with girls. Long story short, it's easier this way, just use the tag.
why don't we have male/female tags? Is it because they're superseded by *sub/*dom tags?