Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? k-on! 85
Character
- ? azusa nakano 20
- ? mio akiyama 55
- ? ritsu tainaka 19
- ? tsumugi kotobuki 14
- ? yui hirasawa 10
Artist
- ? euronet (manipper) 7
- ? tonee89 1
General
- ? black hair 30379
- ? blonde hair 33300
- ? blush 36827
- ? brown hair 29465
- ? cheerleader 814
- ? empty eyes 36372
- ? femsub 132643
- ? happy trance 46719
- ? looking at viewer 12620
- ? midriff 5713
- ? navel 12401
Meta
- ? caption 8921
- ? manip 16648
- ? text 82928
Statistics
- Id: 41005
-
Posted: 2016-10-15 01:21:49
by Euronet - Size: 1814x992
- Source: tonee89.deviantart.com/ar...732333?offset=50#comments
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 73 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #131923
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #131929
Score: 0 (vote Up)
So I'm in a bit of a pickle in regards to this image. Should I tag it as loli, they have the proportions, but they also all have at least somewhat noticeable breasts. So, does that make it loli or not?
I think in this case the loli-ness is more the general art style than the actual characters. Presence of breasts does lead me to believe they're at least post-pubescent.
>> #131930
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #131979
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #131981
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think in this case the loli-ness is more the general art style than the actual characters. Presence of breasts does lead me to believe they're at least post-pubescent.
They were all off to college at the end of the series too so were presumably 18 by then except Azusa
>> #140992
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #140997
Score: 0 (vote Up)
is this count as loli?
*reads above comments* I don't think it does, in this case. There's prominent "feminine features" which make me think that any loli-ness is just a result of the general almost-chibi art style.