Though I see why one would think that, this unfortunately is not a good enough reason to flag a post. If it's a two parter, and the first part has no MC, it's still allowed to be here, regardless if it's necessary or not or what it shows.
Someone flagged this post for not having MC in it, despite it being the "before" image that lead into the MC. No clue what their thought process // what they were thinking behind the flag.
RedCollarBlackCollar said: Someone flagged this post for not having MC in it, despite it being the "before" image that lead into the MC. No clue what their thought process // what they were thinking behind the flag.
>> #143226
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #143227
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #143293
Score: 0 (vote Up)
...What kinda thought process went through with this flagging... =____=
What thought process?
>> #143294
Score: 0 (vote Up)
What thought process?
Someone flagged this post for not having MC in it, despite it being the "before" image that lead into the MC. No clue what their thought process // what they were thinking behind the flag.
>> #143297
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Someone flagged this post for not having MC in it, despite it being the "before" image that lead into the MC. No clue what their thought process // what they were thinking behind the flag.
Sarcasm I was saying there was no thought process
>> #143299
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Sarcasm I was saying there was no thought process
Couldn't tell, given the flag's since been removed.