Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? nintendo 21685
- ? pokemon 13819
Character
- ? alolan vulpix 18
- ? pokemon (creature) 2336
- ? vulpix 42
Artist
- ? poketizer (manipper) 21
General
- ? animals only 1490
- ? femdom 30162
- ? femsub 132595
- ? furry 17894
- ? hair ribbon 1425
- ? hypnotized hypnotist 3721
- ? looking at viewer 12617
- ? pink eyes 8280
- ? pov 8611
- ? pov sub 5011
- ? ribbon 3094
Meta
- ? caption 8919
- ? manip 16646
- ? text 82749
Statistics
- Id: 43411
-
Posted: 2016-12-29 16:07:12
by Poketizer - Size: 1700x1000
- Source: www.pixiv.net/member_illu...ium&illust_id=5821301
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 46 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
>> #146951
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146955
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146956
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ALERT! ALERT! CUTENESS OVERLOAD! TOO MUCH CUTE TO COMPREHEND! *melts*
*takes note of that*
>> #146957
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146961
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146972
Score: 0 (vote Up)
ALERT! ALERT! CUTENESS OVERLOAD! TOO MUCH CUTE TO COMPREHEND! *melts*
So adorable I just want to squeeze and pet it @.@
>> #146979
Score: 0 (vote Up)
FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME, TAG YOUR WEIRD FURSHIT
THANKS
Wouldn't that only apply if Vulpi was anthro? I quote from the 'furry' tag page:
"Characters that are almost entirely animal in nature - ones that don't have a particularly human body shape, don't have human hands, etc. - do not receive this tag."
While the animals_only tag applies here, the furry tag doesn't.
>> #146980
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #146985
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hey, WhatIsLove, we had a guy here before who used to post the exact same thing on furry pics. He's banned for 2000 years. So try to cool it, okay?
Ya don't think... Nah, couldn't be......
>> #147157
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Ya don't think... Nah, couldn't be......
Did you guys make sure it twas an IP ban, out of curiousity?