Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? overwatch 1336
Character
- ? mei (overwatch) 154
- ? tracer 351
Artist
- ? deeezel 3
General
- ? bent over 1114
- ? blush 36678
- ? bodysuit 6664
- ? bottomless 40797
- ? breast press 1781
- ? breasts 103291
- ? brown hair 29313
- ? embarrassed 1224
- ? femsub 131889
- ? futa with female 828
- ? futadom 1868
- ? futanari 5371
- ? glasses 10113
- ? gloves 14578
- ? groping 4110
- ? hair ornament 3847
- ? huge breasts 22228
- ? lipstick 6085
- ? looking at viewer 12575
- ? looking back 1619
- ? makeup 3289
- ? multiple girls 15484
- ? nude 38521
- ? orange eyes 1745
- ? panties 8356
- ? penis 26700
- ? sex 17701
- ? short hair 40963
- ? sideboob 1124
- ? smile 28635
- ? sweat 11288
- ? thong 1953
- ? topless 44501
- ? underwear 11399
Statistics
- Id: 43533
-
Posted: 2017-01-02 20:08:15
by Zementblock - Size: 672x880
- Source: danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2360885
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 53 (vote up)
>> #147838
Score: 0 (vote Up)
What I'm confused about is "how". I mean that's a ridiculous amount of tags, most of which are unofficial and should be removed (done now), but that shouldn't be causing this to happen...
Also the thumbnail is still showing up so the flag shouldn't result in removal quite yet.
>> #147841
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Honestly, this...is extremely puzzling
>> #147845
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Knowing that, my best guess is that there was some kind of glitch due to the filename they uploaded having the hash already in it (danbooru.donmai.us/data/_...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png to 404'd hypnohub.net//data/image/...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png)
>> #147890
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #148168
Score: 0 (vote Up)
As I suspected, it's a copy from danbooru. danbooru.donmai.us/posts/2360885
Knowing that, my best guess is that there was some kind of glitch due to the filename they uploaded having the hash already in it (danbooru.donmai.us/data/_...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png to 404'd hypnohub.net//data/image/...55bd132c9fccd25550769.png)
That shouldn't be an issue. The software converts the image name to its MD5 hash. The hash already being part of the filename shouldn't get in the way of that. But who really knows, I guess.
It's not the first time a post was uploaded where the actual image file was never actually uploaded despite the thumbnail being successfully made. I'll have to keep an eye on the original filenames if I know the sources to see if it really is a naming issue.
I'll fix this manually.
Edit: Done.
_________________________________________
Now, more importantly, I'm not very familiar with the source. so... Can anyone explain how this is MC?