blonde_hair furry futadom futanari looking_at_viewer manip multiple_arms penis pov pov_sub strype t323_(manipper) text

9 comments (0 hidden)

T323
>> #158070
Posted on 2017-02-24 17:57:48
Score: 0 (vote Up)
Hello everyone. This is my... second manip. First manip is kinda stuck in the outer-space and I'm waiting response from moderator.
Also, English is not my native language, so I will really appreciate some help in fixing mistakes.
I hope you'll like it.
До новых встреч!

TCM999
>> #158074
Posted on 2017-02-24 18:21:53
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The only typo I noticed was Voodoo instead of woodoo otherwise very well written in my opinion. :3

Nazwa
>> #158079
Posted on 2017-02-24 18:50:49
Score: 0 (vote Up)
"femdom futanari"

Just for future, T323, it's "futadom".

T323
>> #158081
Posted on 2017-02-24 18:59:16
Score: 0 (vote Up)
DanGambino said:
The grammar on this is...painful.


Well, sorry. I tried my best. Can you tell me which parts are the worst?

wh
Nazwa said:
"femdom futanari"

Just for future, T323, it's "futadom".


Thank you.

DanGambino
>> #158092
Posted on 2017-02-24 20:45:36
Score: 0 (vote Up)
T323 said:
Well, sorry. I tried my best. Can you tell me which parts are the worst?

whThank you.


I feel like I've already been rude enough, and I am an extremely harsh critic. I'll try, though.

For a start, though this is more stylistic than grammar, bracketing actions with asterisks looks unprofessional and creates a negative impression, compared to using more subtle clues, like italicised text. On a related note, naming the offscreen character in a POV piece can be distracting.

On a more grammatical side, there's a definite overuse of ellipses (...) here. Generally speaking they should be used sparingly, mostly only to indicate an incomplete thought or something that continues past what is shown. Next, though this can arguably be grammar or style (depending on how you look at it), your wording is a bit stiff. In formal writing, it's good to use contractions sparingly, but in casual settings, most people compress. That's why contractions exist in the first place - they're essentially verbal and mental shortcuts. Other than that, it's more quantity than severity, though typing "waytress" for waitress was particularly egregious. I can't tell if "woodoo" in place of "voodoo" was intentional or not. There's some other cases of incorrect word choice, like "you're" (you are) in place of "your" (belonging to you), and improper conjugation/verbage ("is" where it should be "are", "I come" where it should say either "I came" or "I've come", etc...) as well. Like I said, it's just the general proliferation of small errors rather than any really major ones on their own.

T323
>> #158095
Posted on 2017-02-24 21:05:56
Score: 0 (vote Up)
DanGambino said:
I feel like I've already been rude enough, and I am an extremely harsh critic. I'll try, though.


Thanks a lot! And do not worry, I'm used to being criticized. I will remember your words.

frank
>> #158151
Posted on 2017-02-25 02:02:22
Score: 0 (vote Up)
There are sone small issues with grammar, yeah, but the story itself is great. Im looking forward to more if you stay this original.

jimskog
>> #158391
Posted on 2017-02-25 23:22:26
Score: 0 (vote Up)
I think this is actually very well done. I wouldn't expect anything better from a *native* English speaker, let alone someone who has English as a 2nd language.

StayPuft
>> #211422
Posted on 2017-11-14 13:16:21
Score: 0 (vote Up)
"I raped you, aren't I?"

1