Search
(Supports wildcard *)Copyright
- ? alice in wonderland 72
- ? nintendo 21636
- ? pokemon 13786
- ? pokemon sun and moon 1082
Character
- ? alice 62
- ? gengar 195
- ? lillie (pokemon) 287
- ? pokemon (creature) 2328
- ? selene (pokemon) 128
Artist
- ? lairreverenteboladepelos 247
General
- ? alternate costume 3354
- ? black hair 30155
- ? blonde hair 33016
- ? bow 2130
- ? cake 95
- ? dress 4572
- ? drool 25024
- ? evil smile 3479
- ? expressionless 20366
- ? female only 56899
- ? femdom 30066
- ? food 618
- ? hair band 991
- ? hypnotized hypnotist 3700
- ? knife 98
- ? long hair 57945
- ? maid 3873
- ? milestone celebration 40
- ? multicolored eyes 471
- ? open mouth 46928
- ? parody 266
- ? pendulum 11768
- ? pocket watch 1625
- ? ponytail 12294
- ? short hair 40963
- ? smile 28635
- ? yuri 6323
Meta
- ? absurdres 34458
Statistics
- Id: 64294
-
Posted: 2018-05-16 09:42:22
by AnzuMazaki - Size: 2894x4093
- Source: hirotostar.deviantart.com/art/It-s-tea-time-745135445
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 165 (vote up)
This image has been resized. Click here to view the original image.
Always view original.
Don't show this message.
1
>> #252327
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #252331
Score: 0 (vote Up)
EDIT: Is this supposed to be the Mad Hatter card controlling Moon, or is it just a card in her head to loosely represent her as the Hatter?
>> #252351
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #252355
Score: 0 (vote Up)
EDIT: Is this supposed to be the Mad Hatter card controlling Moon, or is it just a card in her head to loosely represent her as the Hatter?
Per the sauce it's the former
>> #252388
Score: 0 (vote Up)
The artifacting is in the original
It still suffers from severe jpeg artifacting, whether it's in the original image or not shouldn't matter.
>> #252392
Score: 0 (vote Up)
It still suffers from severe jpeg artifacting, whether it's in the original image or not shouldn't matter.
It kinda does, though. If it were a manip, we could reasonably say that the manipper could have found a clearer version of the image, or barring that, should have used a different image entirely. But for original art, what the artist or commissioner makes available is all we have. Now, if it's drawn poorly, we obviously will reject it. This isn't, however. It was simply saved in less-than-desirable quality, although it does look fine in the resized version. It's unfortunate, but this is what we were given.
>> #252425
Score: 0 (vote Up)
>> #477090
Score: 0 (vote Up)